2009
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2009.2018618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Packet Classification Through Rulebase Partitioning Using the Maximum Entropy Hashing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that N i=1 p(a i ) may be larger than 1. But we can perform a transformation as follows to make it fit into our assumption (4).…”
Section: Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that N i=1 p(a i ) may be larger than 1. But we can perform a transformation as follows to make it fit into our assumption (4).…”
Section: Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the study of network performance via an information-theoretical approach, in [2], [3], the authors analyze network performance from the perspective of information quality and information accuracy, but the target application is not specifically on opportunistic scheduling. In [4], maximum entropy is employed to select the hash keys for partitioning the rulebase in the packet classification problem, while a technique based on minimum entropy is developed in [5] to perform carrier frequency recovery in the non-data-aided manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching algorithm is improved in different perspectives [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] , a faster algorithm is proposed by MEINERS [2] , which is based on TCAM (Ternary Content Addressable Memory). In addition, the time complexity of it is generally constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of matching algorithm is conduct by the hash table, which can get well performance guarantees in the worst case. On the other hand, the average performance is very poor [4] [5] . Thus, the matching algorithm based on decision tree gets higher average performance [6] [7] , but such algorithms in the worst case performance is poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the algorithms based on hash tables have superior space performance, but their speed performance cannot be guaranteed [5] [6]. Decision-tree-based algorithms use a decision tree to divide rules into multiple linear-search groups [7] [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%