2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.04468
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalar absorption cross section of rotating black holes with tidal charge

E. S. de Oliveira

Abstract: The absorption cross section of rotating black holes in the Randall-Sundrum brane-world scenario for massless scalar waves is obtained via the partial-wave method. A variety of incidence directions with respect to the black hole rotation axis is considered. Special attention is given to near-extreme black holes, in which cases the absorption cross section increases as the tidal charge becomes more negative. It is shown that black holes with different configurations can present capture cross sections/shadows of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the numerical investigation, we have observed that in response to the dragging effect, BH's rotation elongates its image toward the rotational axis. While the negative value of tidal charge and cosmological constant contributes to the shadow area, which is consistent with the exploration of Oliveira [53]. On the other hand, their positive values result in diminishing the shadow radius analogously to the findings of Banerjee et.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From the numerical investigation, we have observed that in response to the dragging effect, BH's rotation elongates its image toward the rotational axis. While the negative value of tidal charge and cosmological constant contributes to the shadow area, which is consistent with the exploration of Oliveira [53]. On the other hand, their positive values result in diminishing the shadow radius analogously to the findings of Banerjee et.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%