1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2539(08)60523-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalar Diffraction Theory in Electron Optics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A solution to obtain better profiles would be to calculate a more refined electrostatic potential that brings under control the lateral distribution of the charge, along the y 0 axis in our configuration. Another possibility would be to develop a more elaborate model in the context of the scalar diffraction theory, as Kormska did to study the fringe pattern of an electron beam scattered by an electrostatic field (Kormska, 1971). By assuming that the condition for applicability of the quasiclassical approximation of quantum mechanics is satisfied (this condition expresses the assumption that the potential energy U ( r ) is a slowly varying function of the position ( r ), it is possible to express the wave function in terms of a diffraction integral which adequately describes the electron beam behind the object plane containing weakly charged objects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A solution to obtain better profiles would be to calculate a more refined electrostatic potential that brings under control the lateral distribution of the charge, along the y 0 axis in our configuration. Another possibility would be to develop a more elaborate model in the context of the scalar diffraction theory, as Kormska did to study the fringe pattern of an electron beam scattered by an electrostatic field (Kormska, 1971). By assuming that the condition for applicability of the quasiclassical approximation of quantum mechanics is satisfied (this condition expresses the assumption that the potential energy U ( r ) is a slowly varying function of the position ( r ), it is possible to express the wave function in terms of a diffraction integral which adequately describes the electron beam behind the object plane containing weakly charged objects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the second model is that it can be used to simulate images with variations of charge density, even though from a theoretical point of view these are only a very good approximation of experimental images. Indeed, based on current knowledge, the equivalence of the second model based on the quantum theory of particle diffusion with the correct treatment investigated by Korsmka (Kormska, 1971) had been shown only for a uniformly charged wire. The latter had been developed in the context of the scalar diffraction, in the frame of weak electrostatic fields, but with numerical calculations which are very laborious.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology has greatly evolved since electron diffraction in the 1920s to interferometry in a grating with macromolecules like fullerene in the 1999s [2]. Poisson spot has been demonstrated by means of matter-waves with electrons [3] and deuterium molecules [4]. Some theoretical models study the feasibility of the Poisson spot setup for fullerene [5] and gold clusters [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grating diffraction has already been thoroughly studied with electrons [18,19,20], neutrons [21], atoms [22,23,24] and molecules [25,26,27,28]. The Poisson spot was observed with matter waves for the first time with electrons [29,30] and later extended to 1D diffraction behind a wire and 2D interference behind either a free disk or a zone plate using neutrons [31,21], atoms [32,33] and most recently also the diatomic molecule D 2 [34]. In the following we assume quantum physics to be the correct theory for arbitrary particle size and mass, putting aside recently suggested modifications of standard quantum theory [35,36,37,38,39,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%