2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.063018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalar induced gravitational waves in different gauges

Abstract: In this letter we calculate the scalar induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) accompanying the formation of primordial black hole during the radiation dominated era in three different gauges, i.e. synchronous gauge, Newton gauge and uniform curvature gauge, and we find that the energy density spectra of SIGWs, ΩGW(k), are identical in these three different gauges.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

17
82
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
17
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These LIGO/Virgo BBHs present a much heavier mass distribution (in particular the sourceframe primary mass of GW170729 event can be as heavy as 50.2 +16.2 −10.2 M [7]) than that inferred from X-ray observations [28][29][30][31], which would challenge the formation and evolution mechanisms of astrophysical black holes. One possible explanation for LIGO/Virgo BBHs is the primordial black holes (PBHs) [8][9][10] formed through the gravitational collapse of the primordial density fluctuations [32,33], which may accompany the induced GWs [34][35][36][37]. On the other hand, PBHs can also be a candidate of cold dark matter (CDM), and the abundance of PBHs in CDM has been constrained by various experiments [34,36,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These LIGO/Virgo BBHs present a much heavier mass distribution (in particular the sourceframe primary mass of GW170729 event can be as heavy as 50.2 +16.2 −10.2 M [7]) than that inferred from X-ray observations [28][29][30][31], which would challenge the formation and evolution mechanisms of astrophysical black holes. One possible explanation for LIGO/Virgo BBHs is the primordial black holes (PBHs) [8][9][10] formed through the gravitational collapse of the primordial density fluctuations [32,33], which may accompany the induced GWs [34][35][36][37]. On the other hand, PBHs can also be a candidate of cold dark matter (CDM), and the abundance of PBHs in CDM has been constrained by various experiments [34,36,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the description of the longitudinal gauge is considered more computable and hence more reliable (see e. g. [19]), there are no reasons why this should be the case so that the scheme of Ref. [18] has been subsequently replicated with different and sometimes contradictory conclusions [20,21,22]. Reference [20] attributes the difference of the results to the evolutionary features of each gauge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] has been subsequently replicated with different and sometimes contradictory conclusions [20,21,22]. Reference [20] attributes the difference of the results to the evolutionary features of each gauge. Reference [21] suggests that the effective anisotropic stress is gauge-independent but the authors also imply, in their conclusions, that the observational sensitivities for the tensor perturbations induced from the effective anisotropic stress will be different from those for conventional gravitational waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly curvature inhomogeneities may cause higher-order corrections to the stochastic backgrounds of relic gravitons and this second effect involves an effective anisotropic stress which is customarily assessed within the Landau-Lifshitz prescription [2,6,10,11]. For the same reasons given above the Landau-Lifshitz approach applied to the scalar modes of the geometry is not gauge-invariant: different and sometimes contradictory statements exist in the current literature [12,13,14,15]. Part of the problem is that the gaugedependent derivations follow the dynamical evolutions of the pivotal variables in the particular coordinate system where the results have been derived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relevant property of M (X) (z, w) is that it is generically symmetric for w → z and z → w. In the particular case of the radiation-dominated plasma the exact expressions of 7into Eq. (14). This procedure has been already discussed for an analog situation of waterfall fields in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%