2003
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2003.11682790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
329
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
329
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding habitat requirements is fundamental for improving species' management and conservation strategies (Law and Dickman 1998;Debinski and Holt 2000;Boyce et al 2003). Patterns of habitat selection depend on the scale of analysis: at the landscape scale, habitat selection is regulated by geological and historical processes, and human-induced influences, whereas at the fine scale, it depends on decisions made by individual organisms that directly affect their fitness (Mayor et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding habitat requirements is fundamental for improving species' management and conservation strategies (Law and Dickman 1998;Debinski and Holt 2000;Boyce et al 2003). Patterns of habitat selection depend on the scale of analysis: at the landscape scale, habitat selection is regulated by geological and historical processes, and human-induced influences, whereas at the fine scale, it depends on decisions made by individual organisms that directly affect their fitness (Mayor et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further validate our RSF models we used kfold cross validation to assess the predictive strength for both seasonal models (Boyce et al 2003, Anderson et al 2005, Long et al 2009). We randomly separated the data by individual within seasonal models to construct a training set (75% of data) and test set (25% of data).…”
Section: Resource Selection Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All variables were retained for further analysis because collinearity was not detected. Nonlinearities in woody density, distance to the nearest road, and distance to water were corrected by adding square terms to the model (Boyce et al 2003). Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests for overdispersion (Fernandez 2003) were not significant in any of the models.…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%