1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00044636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale dependency and the expression of hierarchical structure in Delphinium patches

Abstract: Hierarchy theory has provided a valuable conceptual framework for studies of heterogeneity. However, there have been few empirical studies of hierarchical structure and little is known about how hierarchical structure originates or varies among systems. Here, I explore how scale dependency can influence the detection of hierarchical structure. Specifically, I compared how heterogeneity changed with scale in patches of larkspur (Delphinium spp). The distribution of Delphinium nelsonii inflorescences was quite u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plants produce multiple stems each year, about 1 m tall. Stems bearing inflorescences are about 1.5 m tall with dense racemes of dark purple flowers visited by bumblebees and hummingbirds (Inouye 1978;Wright 1988;Kotliar 1996). Mean date of flowering (first flower) is about 15 July in our study site, about 1 month after its congener D. nuttallianum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants produce multiple stems each year, about 1 m tall. Stems bearing inflorescences are about 1.5 m tall with dense racemes of dark purple flowers visited by bumblebees and hummingbirds (Inouye 1978;Wright 1988;Kotliar 1996). Mean date of flowering (first flower) is about 15 July in our study site, about 1 month after its congener D. nuttallianum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 bance, over a wide range of spatial scales (Chaneton and Facelli 1991, Clark 1991, Hiura 1995. While descriptive studies have frequently examined patterns in relation to changes in the spatial extent of sampling (e.g., Fowler et al 1992, Morrisey et al 1992, Migné and Davoult 1995, the effects of changes in the spatial scale (the grain) of sampling on the perception of patterns have been less frequently investigated (but see Schneider and Duffy 1985, Schneider and Piatt 1986, Moody and Woodcock 1995, Kotliar 1996, Qi and Wu 1996, Obeysekera and Rutchey 1997, Riitters et al 1997. While descriptive studies have frequently examined patterns in relation to changes in the spatial extent of sampling (e.g., Fowler et al 1992, Morrisey et al 1992, Migné and Davoult 1995, the effects of changes in the spatial scale (the grain) of sampling on the perception of patterns have been less frequently investigated (but see Schneider and Duffy 1985, Schneider and Piatt 1986, Moody and Woodcock 1995, Kotliar 1996, Qi and Wu 1996, Obeysekera and Rutchey 1997, Riitters et al 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research needs to examine if the relationship among these components changes as the scale of observation is altered because of the hypothesized scale-dependency of hierarchical relationships (Kotliar, 1996;O'Neill & King, 1998). Regardless of the potential influence of scale, our study suggests the assumption implicit within the design of many restoration projects in channelized streams of the southeastern United States may not be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, only a few studies have used hierarchy theory to develop research hypotheses and predictions (Kolasa, 1989;Taylor et al, 1993;Vaughn & Taylor, 2000). Therefore, there is a limited amount of information on the presence of hierarchical structure in streams and other ecosystems (Kotliar, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%