Scale-dependent determinants of plant species richness in a semi-arid fragmented agro-ecosystem

Abstract

Aims: (1) Understanding how the relationship between species richness and its determinants depends on the interaction between scales at which the response and explanatory variables are measured. (2) Quantifying the relative contributions of local, intermediate and large‐scale determinants of species richness in a fragmented agro‐ecosystem. (3) Testing the hypothesis that the relative contribution of these determinants varies with the grain size at which species richness is measured. Location: A fragmented agro‐ecosystem in the Southern Judea Lowland, Israel, within a desert–Mediterranean transition zone. Methods: Plant species richness was estimated using hierarchical nested sampling in 81 plots, positioned in 38 natural vegetation patches within an agricultural matrix (mainly wheat fields) among three land units along a sharp precipitation gradient. Explanatory variables included position along that gradient, patch area, patch isolation, habitat heterogeneity and overall plant density. We used general linear models and hierarchical partitioning of variance to test and quantify the effect of each explanatory variable on species richness at four grain sizes (0.0625, 1, 25 and 225 m2). Results: Species richness was mainly affected by position along a precipitation gradient and overall plant density, and to a lesser extent by habitat heterogeneity. It was also significantly affected by patch area and patch isolation, but only for small grain sizes. The contribution of each explanatory variable to explained variance in species richness varied with grain size, i.e. scale‐dependent. The influence of geographic position and habitat heterogeneity on species richness increased with grain size, while the influence of plant density decreased with grain size. Main conclusions: Species richness is determined by the combined effect of several scale‐dependent determinants. Ability to detect an effect and effect size of each determinant varies with the scale (grain size) at which it is measured. The combination of a multi‐factorial approach and multi‐scale sampling reveals that conclusions drawn from studies that ignore these dimensions are restricted and potentially misleading.

Dry Grasslands of Southern Europe: Syntaxonomy, Management and Conservation

“…It is therefore possible that the higher species pool there might result in small-scale species richness that even exceeds the values of the more northern record holders (White Carpathians, Transylvania and hemiboreal alvars). This speculation cannot, however, be answered at present since there are only very few comparable datasets of scale-dependent plant diversity patterns from the Mediterranean region (de Bello et al 2007, Giladi et al 2011. So far, no scale-dependent richness values have been presented that are higher than those published in Wilson et al (2012), either from the Mediterranean Basin or from anywhere else.…”

Scale sensitivity of the relationship between alpha and gamma diversity along an alpine elevation gradient in central Nepal

“…1;Levin 1992;Giladi et al 2011;Arroyo-Rodríguez et al 2017). At the broadest spatial scales and over the longest temporal scales, the proximate drivers such as speciation, extinction, migration, biogeographic history, evolutionary history, and regional species pool, and the ultimate drivers such as climate, energy, water, and topography are more influential (Ricklefs 1987;Hawkins et al 2003;O'Brien 2006;Pärtel et al 2007;Harrison & Cornell 2008;Field et al 2009).…”

Comparing the Dry Season In-Situ Leaf Area Index (LAI) Derived from High-Resolution RapidEye Imagery with MODIS LAI in a Namibian Savanna

“…As the field data was also intended to serve as the ground-truth for the remote sensing data, scale had to be considered in relation to the spatial resolution of the RapidEye images, especially with regards to areas of relative homogeneity. Such sampling is referred to as "nested", as the scale of observation determines the perception of an entity [40]. Representative plots of at least 30 × 30 m (6 × 6 pixels) within a FLU and a minimum buffer of 10 m to the adjacent FLU were chosen and geo-located using a GPS.…”