Scale-dependent effects of climate on two copepod species, Calanus glacialis and Pseudocalanus minutus, in an Arctic-boreal sea

Abstract

Climate-driven changes in the phenology and composition of plankton affect ecosystem structure and function, but knowledge about such changes is limited by the scarcity of highquality, high-resolution, long-term monitoring data. Using a high-resolution observation series from the White Sea, spanning > 50 yr, we explored how water temperature and salinity influenced 2 key copepod species, Calanus glacialis and Pseudocalanus minutus. The results of the analysis depended critically on the temporal and life-stage resolution of the analysis. Copepod biomass was negatively correlated with salinity, but not correlated with temperature, when using annually aggregated data. However, salinity showed very small effects at a monthly resolution, failing to support a causal effect of salinity. On the other hand, temperature did show effects: in warm years, the biomass of C. glacialis increased earlier in spring and declined earlier in autumn. Analysis of stage-resolved data revealed a new level of complexity. The increase of biomass in spring at warmer temperatures mainly consisted of young life stages, whereas the decrease in autumn was mainly caused by reductions in older life stages. Temperature affected the phenology of several life stages of P. minutus, but not its total biomass, implying that climate effects on different life stages cancelled each other out. We argue that such climate-driven fluctuations in zooplankton phenology and age structure are likely to influence the role of the zooplankton as predators, competitors and prey, but that these effects of climate could remain unnoticed when using the coarser resolution of many sampling programs.KEY WORDS: Scale dependence · Copepods · Developmental stages · Temperature · Marine · White Sea · Phenology · Generalized additive modelling Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 468: [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83] 2012 temperature−size rule), although the mechanisms causing such a shift are not clear. Changes in the structure of marine ecosystems can affect their function, which, in turn, may feed back on the structure. For example, shifts in the timing and size spectra of prey (copepods) influence the survival of juvenile cod (Munk 1997, Beaugrand et al. 2003), a key species in many North Atlantic shelf systems. In order to understand how climate affects the dynamics of marine ecosystems, it is therefore important to consider the associated changes in ecosystem structure, which requires data with sufficient resolution in space, time (season) and species' stage and size composition.In recent decades we have seen significant changes in the distribution and phenology of zooplankton. For example, the copepod biomass peak in the Central North Sea has advanced by 10 d in 45 yr (reviewed by Richardson 2008). In the Arctic, changes in the circulation and temperature of water and air, as well as changes in ice cover, have been shown to lead to increased primary production and altered zooplan...

Seasonal dynamics and life histories of three sympatric species of Pseudocalanus in two Svalbard fjords

“…Elsewhere, P. minutus dominates in seasonally ice-covered Arctic shelf seas ( Melnikov et al. , 2005 ; Persson et al. , 2012 ; Ershova and Kosobokova, 2019 ), including waters around Svalbard ( Werner, 2005 ; Weydmann et al., 2013 ), but it is also numerous in the deep waters of the North Atlantic to the east of Jan Mayen ( Wiborg, 1955 ; Aarbakke et al.…”

Biogeographic responses of the copepod Calanus glacialis to a changing Arctic marine environment

“…Observational evidence from Arctic/subarctic seas that revealed responses of copepod cohort development indirectly supported our model results. In the White Sea (Russia), analyses of 50‐year zooplankton survey data revealed that in warmer years, the biomass of C. glacialis populations increased earlier in spring and consisted mostly of younger stages, while the biomass of fall populations declined earlier due to the reductions of older stages (Persson, Stige, Stenseth, Usov, & Martynova, ), probably because warmer temperatures accelerated growth and development with the resultant early descent into diapause. In the Chukchi Sea, significant increases in the biomass and abundance of zooplankton (particularly C. glacialis ) were found in recent warm years as compared to the earlier cold years (Ershova et al., ).…”

Seasonal Variability in the Zooplankton Community Structure in a Sub-Arctic Fjord as Revealed by Morphological and Molecular Approaches

“…P. minutus the largest of the observed species, has a strictly annual life cycle in other parts of the world, spending most of its life as C4-C5 copepodites and relying on lipid stores more than its sibling species (McLaren et al, 1989). The distribution of P. minutus is generally restricted to ice-covered Arctic shelf seas (Melnikov et al, 2005;Persson et al, 2012;Ershova and Kosobokova, 2019) or the deep Atlantic Ocean (Wiborg, 1955;Aarbakke et al, 2017). In Isfjorden, a Svalbard fjord heavily influenced by Atlantic advection and lacking a seasonal ice cover, P. minutus failed to complete its life cycle and was only advected into the fjord during the summer months (Ershova et al, 2021).…”