2010
DOI: 10.1080/11250000902766926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale‐dependent environmental variables affecting red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris meridionalis) distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Red squirrels prefer high canopy trees to build their middens ( Fig. 9 ), which agrees with what the literature elaborates about squirrel habitat choice for the red squirrel ( Kemp & Keith, 1970 ) as well as for the European red squirrel ( Rima et al, 2010 ; Flaherty, Lurz & Patenaude, 2014 ). The fact that squirrels give preference to dense ( Gurnell, 1984 ) or interlocking canopy to increase their foraging success and their escape possibilities from predators ( Elkins et al, 2018 ; Steele, 1998 ; Vahle & Patton, 1983 ; Smith, 1968a ) supports these outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Red squirrels prefer high canopy trees to build their middens ( Fig. 9 ), which agrees with what the literature elaborates about squirrel habitat choice for the red squirrel ( Kemp & Keith, 1970 ) as well as for the European red squirrel ( Rima et al, 2010 ; Flaherty, Lurz & Patenaude, 2014 ). The fact that squirrels give preference to dense ( Gurnell, 1984 ) or interlocking canopy to increase their foraging success and their escape possibilities from predators ( Elkins et al, 2018 ; Steele, 1998 ; Vahle & Patton, 1983 ; Smith, 1968a ) supports these outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We emphasize four key-issues relevant for future studies: 1. We did not consider the quality or vegetation structure of forest patches, which is an important predictor in fragmented landscapes for many species including the hazel dormouse and the red squirrel (Van Apeldoorn, Celada & Nieuwenhuizen 1994;Bright & Morris 1996;Rima et al 2010). Part of the unexplained variance found in the first ranked model of both species could be explained by the quality of patches in the landscapes.…”
Section: Rodent Distribution In Fragmented Landscapes 159mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… We did not consider the quality or vegetation structure of forest patches, which is an important predictor in fragmented landscapes for many species including the hazel dormouse and the red squirrel (Van Apeldoorn, Celada & Nieuwenhuizen 1994; Bright & Morris 1996; Rima et al. 2010).…”
Section: Implications For the Management Of Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The squirrel selectivity at the landscape scale was further reinforced by the results of the models obtained with the map of vegetation associations, which showed a clear influence only for the red squirrel and indicated a preference for oak woods and coniferous reforestations. Even in a landscape naturally dominated by broadleaf species, where conifers covered less than the 2% of the study area, the squirrel confirms its preference for this element (Van Apeldoorn et al 1994;Rima et al 2010). Considering that in terms of landscape configuration, the most relevant factors were the length of shared perimeter between hedgerows and woods and the amount of woods, we can sustain the dominant role of landscape structure on occupancy patterns (Celada et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%