1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01033029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
202
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
202
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The fine root samples do not show any significant differences in the box counting dimension between the species, whereas the coarse root systems do. A discrepancy in fractal dimension between coarse and fine root scale seems to occur at least for Grewia flava and Strychnos cocculoides, possibly due to a multifractal behaviour of the root systems, which is not unusual in natural phenomena [27,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fine root samples do not show any significant differences in the box counting dimension between the species, whereas the coarse root systems do. A discrepancy in fractal dimension between coarse and fine root scale seems to occur at least for Grewia flava and Strychnos cocculoides, possibly due to a multifractal behaviour of the root systems, which is not unusual in natural phenomena [27,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Because of typical gaps in the data delivered by the terrestrial laser scanner, the variogram method was used to estimate fractal parameters, which can be applied for irregular data [e.g., Mark and Aronson, 1984;Sun et al, 2006]. The surface investigated must fulfill the conditions of a fractal Brownian surface [Xu et al, 1993].…”
Section: Estimating Fractal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klinkenberg (1992) suggested that a phenomenon fits over scales and that its features are nested in discrete scale intervals, leading to a strong correlation between features and phenomena (Mark and Aronson, 1984). In human vision, the neural network is able to distinguish specific features in relation to a corresponding scale (Marr, 1982), as well as to carry out a multiresolution analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%