2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale dependent structuring of spatial diversity in two temperate forest communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the ISAR and mISAR results, the majority of the studied species act as diversity accumulators, especially at distances closer than 10 m (Zhang et al. ). Therefore, the diversity‐promoting interactions are likely to increase the local species diversity in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ISAR and mISAR results, the majority of the studied species act as diversity accumulators, especially at distances closer than 10 m (Zhang et al. ). Therefore, the diversity‐promoting interactions are likely to increase the local species diversity in our study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest was heavily disturbed by forest management about 60 years ago, and most canopy trees are now 100–120 years old (Zhang et al. ). The topography in the MF is usually flat with elevations ranging from 459 to 517 m above sea level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a modified version of the ISAR to assess the contribution of individual focal species to structuring local species richness in two 25.6 ha, fully mapped forest research plots. Our study sites are temperate old-growth coniferous forests, permitting a novel application of the ISAR concept; the few earlier studies to investigate ISAR have been limited to angiosperm-dominated forests (Punchi-Manage et al, 2015;Tsai et al, 2015;Wiegand et al, 2007;Yang et al, 2013;Zhang, Jin, Gao, & Zhao, 2014) and shrublands (e.g. Chacón-Labella, Cruz, & Escudero, 2016;Perry, Miller, Lamont, & Enright, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%