1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00195598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale effects in polymer solution pipe flow

Abstract: Satisfactory scaling from laboratory-scale pipe-flow data to large industrial pipelines is an area of practical concern in the utilization of drag-reducing polymer solutions. From experimental data for pipes 0.0254 m in diameter and above, it is shown that accurate scaling can be obtained using a simple, pocket-calculator method. However, pipes of say, 0.005 m and smaller provide much less accurate scaling data for larger pipes. A detailed study of the velocity profiles in drag-reducing flow indicates a total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such case, the similarity of velocity profiles is broken because of the growing extension of the viscous sublayer (see Ref. [12]). In Bewersdorff's data base [13], pipe diameters are 20-30 times smaller than our pipe and this might make the scaling inaccurate [12].…”
Section: Scale Up Of Drag Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such case, the similarity of velocity profiles is broken because of the growing extension of the viscous sublayer (see Ref. [12]). In Bewersdorff's data base [13], pipe diameters are 20-30 times smaller than our pipe and this might make the scaling inaccurate [12].…”
Section: Scale Up Of Drag Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. We evaluate and discuss the predictive ability of one empirical scaling [12] based on drag reduction data collected in laboratory scale test rigs (pipe diameter equal to 3, 5, and 6 mm, in Ref. [13]; 10, 25, and 50 mm in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoyt and Sellin [18] suggested that the reason for this limited success is the relatively stronger effect of the laminar sublayer in small tubes than in larger tubes. They suggested that, in general, only tubes with diameters larger than 10 mm can be scaled adequately by almost all proposed methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional advantage is that there is no need to build a large‐scale flow device or use a high flow velocity by this new correlation. In most previous correlations for the drag reduction estimation, the friction factor was a function of Reynolds number . In the Reynolds number definition, the diameter and velocity are the numerators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%