2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2020.103189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale factor database for the vibration frequencies calculated in M06-2X, one of the DFT methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These Δ G ° values were calculated without scaling factor and with the recommended scaling factor of 0.970 for thermochemistry calculations with M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p). 10 The results were identical among them and almost identical or very close to the Δ E values (see the Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These Δ G ° values were calculated without scaling factor and with the recommended scaling factor of 0.970 for thermochemistry calculations with M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p). 10 The results were identical among them and almost identical or very close to the Δ E values (see the Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…When the calculations at the M06-2X level of the main conformers showed discrepancies or gave very close values for some of them, we carried out calculations with the CCSD(T)/6-311+G(d,p) method, with Gaussian 16, or obtained the free enthalpies (Gibbs free energies, G °) from the frequency calculations at the M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level, without using scaling factors or, when indicated, with reported scaling factors, 10 to confirm whether the energy differences among the conformers were practically maintained or not. Δ G ° values were also calculated for many exchange equilibria: G values with the CPCM method come from Spartan’20, unless otherwise indicated; those with the SMD method arise from Gaussian 16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is almost never a separation of the training dataset used to fit the scaling factor and the test dataset used to determine its performance. A notable and praiseworthy exception is the recent work of Ünal et al 54 ; we strongly encourage this approach in future studies calculating and evaluating harmonic frequency scaling factors.…”
Section: Best Model Chemistry According To Existing Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Traditionally, scaling factor papers have unfortunately only reported performance for a training dataset rather than an independent test dataset, unsatisfactory from a data science perspective. We praise the recent work of Ünal et al 54 in dividing their benchmark set of molecules into a training (82.2% of the original data) and a test (remaining 17.8%) set and strongly recommend this approach for all future studies.…”
Section: Separation Of Training and Test Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GaussView 5.0.8 are used to assign both observed and computed IR wavenumbers. All theoretical wavenumbers are multiplied by 0.96 (El-Sheshtawy et al 2015;Ghrib et al 2021;Ünal et al 2021) to fit with recorded ones. Both recorded and computed wavenumbers and the appropriate assignments are registered in Table 2.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%