2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.123516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-independent R2 inflation

Abstract: Weyl (scale) invariant theories of scalars and gravity can generate all mass scales spontaneously. In this paper we study a particularly simple version -scale invariant R 2 gravity -and show that, during an inflationary period, it leads to fluctuations which, for a particular parameter choice, are almost indistinguishable from normal R 2 inflation. Current observations place tight constraints on the primary coupling constant of this theory and predict a tensor to scalar ratio, 0.0033 > r > 0.0026, which is tes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the coupling v μ − σ in (45) is vanishing and therefore v μ (t) cannot affect inflation; this means we have single-field inflation of potential (46) and standard slow-roll formulae can be used. Further, since M is just a phase transition scale, field values σ ≥ M are natural.V(σ ) is similar to that in Weyl gravity R 2 -inflation, see [28,47] for a detailed analysis 26 ; however, as mentioned, the couplings and field normalization in the potential differ (for same initial couplings and non-metricity trace); hence the spectral index n s and tensorto-scalar ratio r are different, too, and need to be analyzed separately.…”
Section: Palatini R 2 Inflationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then the coupling v μ − σ in (45) is vanishing and therefore v μ (t) cannot affect inflation; this means we have single-field inflation of potential (46) and standard slow-roll formulae can be used. Further, since M is just a phase transition scale, field values σ ≥ M are natural.V(σ ) is similar to that in Weyl gravity R 2 -inflation, see [28,47] for a detailed analysis 26 ; however, as mentioned, the couplings and field normalization in the potential differ (for same initial couplings and non-metricity trace); hence the spectral index n s and tensorto-scalar ratio r are different, too, and need to be analyzed separately.…”
Section: Palatini R 2 Inflationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Inflation in EP quadratic gravity has a specific prediction for the tensor-to-scalar ratio 0.007 ≤ r ≤ 0.010 for the current spectral index n s at 95% CL. This range of r is distinct from that predicted by inflation in Weyl gravity [28,47] and will soon be reached by CMB experiments [79][80][81]. The conclusions are presented in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SMW model can have successful inflaton. The Higgs potential in (43) can drive inflation as discussed in [30,31,58]. But who "ordered" the Higgs in the early Universe?…”
Section: Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can now use Lagrangian ( 16) and potential V (ϕ) of ( 17) to study inflation with ϕ as the inflaton and compare its predictions for the Weyl (γ = 1/4) and Palatini (γ = 1) cases. For a previous study of inflation in the Weyl case, see 9 [7,76]. Lagrangian ( 16) describes a single scalar field in Einstein gravity and the usual formalism for a single-field inflation can be used.…”
Section: Weyl Versus Palatinimentioning
confidence: 99%