2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2016.7533089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-invariant anomaly detection with multiscale group-sparse models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They improve upon previous results by Carrera et al (2017), who build a dictionary that yields a sparse representation of the normal data. Similar approaches using sparse representations for novelty detection are (Boracchi et al, 2014;Carrera et al, 2015Carrera et al, , 2016. Schlegl et al (2017) train a GAN on optical coherence tomography images of the retina and detect anomalies such as retinal fluid by searching for a latent sample that minimizes the per-pixel 2 -reconstruction error as well as a discriminator loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They improve upon previous results by Carrera et al (2017), who build a dictionary that yields a sparse representation of the normal data. Similar approaches using sparse representations for novelty detection are (Boracchi et al, 2014;Carrera et al, 2015Carrera et al, , 2016. Schlegl et al (2017) train a GAN on optical coherence tomography images of the retina and detect anomalies such as retinal fluid by searching for a latent sample that minimizes the per-pixel 2 -reconstruction error as well as a discriminator loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As typical in the anomaly-detection context, anomalies are then detected as patches corresponding to outliers with respect to the features distribution [22]. Another reason for using [19] is that this algorithm can be extended to operate at different magnification levels [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.5.1. Our experiments [7] show that employing a multiscale approach in all phases of the algorithm (dictionary learning, sparse coding and anomaly indicators) achieves good anomaly detection performance even when training and test images are acquired at different scales.…”
Section: Multiscale Anomaly-detectionmentioning
confidence: 91%