2016
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale‐Invariant Directional Alignment of Surface Parametrizations

Abstract: Various applications of global surface parametrization benefit from the alignment of parametrization isolines with principal curvature directions. This is particularly true for recent parametrization‐based meshing approaches, where this directly translates into a shape‐aware edge flow, better approximation quality, and reduced meshing artifacts. Existing methods to influence a parametrization based on principal curvature directions suffer from scale‐dependence, which implies the necessity of parameter variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the results in this section we created the input seamless parametrization by optimizing the energy proposed by Bommes et al [BZK09] which minimizes the difference between the parametrization gradient to a cross field. The cross fields were obtained using the method of Bommes et al [BZK09] with directional constraints as proposed by [CIE*16] (Sections 7 and 7.1), or using the method of Viertel et al [VOS19] (Section 7.2). For models B otijo and E lk , as well as those in Section 7.3, we used the frame field provided in the supplemental material of [PPM*16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the results in this section we created the input seamless parametrization by optimizing the energy proposed by Bommes et al [BZK09] which minimizes the difference between the parametrization gradient to a cross field. The cross fields were obtained using the method of Bommes et al [BZK09] with directional constraints as proposed by [CIE*16] (Sections 7 and 7.1), or using the method of Viertel et al [VOS19] (Section 7.2). For models B otijo and E lk , as well as those in Section 7.3, we used the frame field provided in the supplemental material of [PPM*16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess our method in the context of other fully‐automatic quadrangulation techniques, we compare the results generated using our approach to those obtained using the curvature‐based field synthesis methods presented by B ommes et al [BZK09], C ampen et al [CIE∗16] and M arcias et al [MPP∗13]. For our comparison, we use the implementations and default parameters which were kindly provided by the respective authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of enforcing specific points to be connected by isocurves, one can enforce isocurves to form cyclic loops rather than spirals or helices around parts of an object [BLK11]. This can be achieved using a variation, or special case, of connection constraints, with a = b and the path p forming a closed loop [CIE∗16, 4.3]:…”
Section: Seamless Parametrizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%