2023
DOI: 10.32604/iasc.2022.029850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale Invariant Feature Transform with Crow Optimization for Breast Cancer Detection

Abstract: Mammography is considered a significant image for accurate breast cancer detection. Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) contributes to classifying the query mammography image and retrieves similar mammographic images from the database. This CBIR system helps a physician to give better treatment. Local features must be described with the input images to retrieve similar images. Existing methods are inefficient and inaccurate by failing in local features analysis. Hence, efficient digital mammography image retr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional image processing approaches in breast cancer detection involve steps like image enhancement, handcrafted feature extraction, and feature classification. Previously, widely recognized feature extraction methods such as Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [25], Gray Level Cooccurrences Matrix (GLCM) [25,26], Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) [26], and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [25,27] have been utilized. Simultaneously, machine-learning classifiers like Support Vector Machine (SVM) [25], Naive Bayes (NB) [28], and Random Forest (RF) [25,28] have been employed to distinguish between malignant and benign tumors in mammographic images.…”
Section: Current State-of-the-art In Bcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional image processing approaches in breast cancer detection involve steps like image enhancement, handcrafted feature extraction, and feature classification. Previously, widely recognized feature extraction methods such as Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [25], Gray Level Cooccurrences Matrix (GLCM) [25,26], Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) [26], and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [25,27] have been utilized. Simultaneously, machine-learning classifiers like Support Vector Machine (SVM) [25], Naive Bayes (NB) [28], and Random Forest (RF) [25,28] have been employed to distinguish between malignant and benign tumors in mammographic images.…”
Section: Current State-of-the-art In Bcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selvi et al [27] Utilized the Kalman filter for noise removal and SIFT features in their BCD framework.…”
Section: Cbis-ddsmmentioning
confidence: 99%