2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2004.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale modification: alternative approaches and their consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is in line with the literature which suggests the commonly used approach of adaptation of the SERVQUAL scale (Finn and Kayande, 2004). Then, hierarchical structure of evaluation process was drawn ( Figure 2), and weight of each criterion was calculated in fuzzy environment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This approach is in line with the literature which suggests the commonly used approach of adaptation of the SERVQUAL scale (Finn and Kayande, 2004). Then, hierarchical structure of evaluation process was drawn ( Figure 2), and weight of each criterion was calculated in fuzzy environment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, respecification of a SEM model is controversial issue in the literature (Davcik, 2014). Finn and Kayande (2004) claimed that there is little attention to evaluate consequences of model modifications and they have pointed out that a modified model can be reliable for one specific purpose but not for another. Jöreskog (1993) demonstrated a way to get final model via the LaGrange multiplier test when the initial model does not fit the data well.…”
Section: Model Re-specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale refinement and purification included detailed item, exploratory factor, and confirmatory factor analyses to provide an initial assessment of scale reliability, unidimensionality, and convergent and discriminant validity. Standard scale development guidelines (e.g., Churchill, 1979;Hair, Anderson, Tatham, & Black, 1998), as well as emerging recommendations for scale development, were employed in item reduction and assessment of MEASURING THE PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND RISKS OF ONLINE SHOPPING the resulting factor structure (e.g., Finn & Kayande, 2004;Netemeyer et al, 2003;Rossiter, 2002).…”
Section: Scale Refinement and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%