2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003237808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: Renzulli Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, self-report questionnaires or teacher ratings tend to be better suited for measuring SRL as a more stable trait across multiple situations and contexts. Creativity researchers also use a variety of self-report questionnaires (e.g., Miller, 2014) and teacher ratings (e.g., Renzulli et al, 1997) that measure creative achievements, creative processes/behaviors, and creative self-efficacy as a traitlike construct. While these measures provide important information, they tend to depict one’s generalized approach as opposed to how they will approach one specific task (Dinsmore, Alexander, & Loughlin, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, self-report questionnaires or teacher ratings tend to be better suited for measuring SRL as a more stable trait across multiple situations and contexts. Creativity researchers also use a variety of self-report questionnaires (e.g., Miller, 2014) and teacher ratings (e.g., Renzulli et al, 1997) that measure creative achievements, creative processes/behaviors, and creative self-efficacy as a traitlike construct. While these measures provide important information, they tend to depict one’s generalized approach as opposed to how they will approach one specific task (Dinsmore, Alexander, & Loughlin, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collection instrument for this study required JROTC‐specific questions and existing measures of adolescent and emerging adult leadership (e.g., Leadership Skills Inventory, Karnes & Chauvin, 2000; Scales for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students ‐ Revised, Renzulli et al, 2002; Roets Rating Scale for Leadership, Roets, 1986) were not specific enough to capture the data needed to answer the research questions, so a self‐report survey was created. Although the researcher‐created survey was extensively reviewed by professionals in educational research and piloted with JROTC students to check the clarity of the instructions and the survey tasks, the length of the survey may have contributed to the number of incomplete responses ( n = 16; 18.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the teacher rating scales aimed at determining the gifted individuals in the pre-school period were examined, it was seen that reading and writing or just reading were shown as a criterion in these measurement tools. It was observed that items such as applies previously learned literary concepts to new reading experiences", "shows interest in reading other types of interest-based reading materials" were included in the reading characteristics subtest of the Scales for Rating The Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students scale developed by Renzulli et al, (2002) and revised in 2012. Similarly, in the Gifted Rating Scale-Preschool Kindergarden Form developed by Pfeiffer & Jarosewich, 2008, it was observed that items related to both reading and writing skills such as "reads unfamiliar words by uttering them", "understands written material."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%