2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.073103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling behavior of entanglement in two- and three-dimensional free-fermion systems

Abstract: Exactly solving a spinless fermionic system in two and three dimensions, we investigate the scaling behavior of the block entropy in critical and non-critical phases. The scaling of the block entropy crucially depends on the nature of the excitation spectrum of the system and on the topology of the Fermi surface. Noticeably, in the critical phases the scaling violates the area law and acquires a logarithmic correction only when a well defined Fermi surface exists in the system. When the area law is violated, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
152
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
14
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For regular block and Fermi surface, numerical analysis has confirmed the modified area-law for critical two-dimensional (Barthel et al, 2006a;Li et al, 2006) and three-dimensional models. Barthel et al, 2006a study the tight binding model as an example for a two-dimensional model with a connected Fermi surface as well as the model…”
Section: Fermi Systemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For regular block and Fermi surface, numerical analysis has confirmed the modified area-law for critical two-dimensional (Barthel et al, 2006a;Li et al, 2006) and three-dimensional models. Barthel et al, 2006a study the tight binding model as an example for a two-dimensional model with a connected Fermi surface as well as the model…”
Section: Fermi Systemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…8, a numerical fit shows that the prefactor of the leading L ln L term is almost certainly exactly 1/3 as predicted by a formula based on the Widom conjecture [96,97]. Of course, unlike the one-dimensional case the prefactor is not universal and depends, for example, on the chemical potential.…”
Section: Entanglement Entropy Of Fermions In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In D > 1, the relation between the scaling of entanglement entropy and the existence of a gap in H is less clear-cut. For instance, the study of possible scalings of entanglement entropy in the ground state of systems of free fermions shows that the boundary law is obeyed by gapped systems, as expected, but also for a class of critical systems (namely, systems with a Fermi surface of dimension Γ smaller than D − 1), whereas a second class of critical systems (with a Fermi surface of dimension Γ = D − 1) display logarithmic multiplicative corrections to the boundary law [75][76][77][78] , see Table I. Such logarithmic corrections are also believed to be present in other gapless systems in D > 1 dimensions, such as Fermi Liquids and spin Bose metals [79][80][81][82][83] .…”
Section: B Entanglement Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also ground states that display logarithmic corrections to the above boundary law [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83] ,…”
Section: B Entanglement Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%