2016
DOI: 10.1520/gtj20160042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Considerations for 1-g Model Horizontal Plate Anchor Tests in Sand

Abstract: This paper addresses scaling issues related to small-scale 1-g model tests on plate anchors in sand under drained loading conditions. Previous centrifuge studies from the literature have suggested that the results of conventional 1-g model testing are inaccurate because of scale effects. Other studies have suggested, however, that scaling errors can be reduced in 1-g model tests if the results are presented in dimensionless form and the constitutive response of the model soil is representative of the prototype… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, larger diameter and centrifuge tests provide a lower bound for the results (Schiavon et al 2016, Giampa et al 2017, Perez et al 2017 while the very small-scale tests tend to provide larger bearing factors (Baker and Konder 1966, Mitsch and Clemence 1985, Murray and Geddes 1987, Ghaly et al 1991. The larger capacity of small-scale tests may be explained by dilatancy which is more pronounced due to low confining stress as suggested by Bradshaw et al (2016).…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, larger diameter and centrifuge tests provide a lower bound for the results (Schiavon et al 2016, Giampa et al 2017, Perez et al 2017 while the very small-scale tests tend to provide larger bearing factors (Baker and Konder 1966, Mitsch and Clemence 1985, Murray and Geddes 1987, Ghaly et al 1991. The larger capacity of small-scale tests may be explained by dilatancy which is more pronounced due to low confining stress as suggested by Bradshaw et al (2016).…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In centrifuge tests or 1g-chamber tests, the tested anchor size B is usually between 15 and 50 mm (Merifield & Sloan, 2006;Garnier et al, 2007;Chow et al, 2015;Bradshaw et al, 2016;Schiavon et al, 2016), with grain-size d 50 of few hundredths microns. This leads to B/d ranging from a few dozens to a few hundreds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing plate anchor behaviour in sand The capacity of a buried plate anchor is dependent on the embedment depth, shape, orientation, loading type and loading angle (in-plane or out-of-plane) and the stiffness of the soil (Bradshaw et al, 2016). Murray and Geddes (1987) showed that the anchor pull-out capacity increased as the embedment ratio increased.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%