Scaling Effects in Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Aggregation in Integrated River Basin Management

Abstract

For river basin management plans (RBMPs), measures are aggregated from smaller spatial units (e.g., water bodies) to the catchment or basin scale. River basin management plans measures in integrated management are evaluated using multiple criteria, e.g., ecological and socio-economiccriteria, etc. Therefore, aggregation often combines spatial analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Herein, we investigate: (1) the effect of applying different aggregation pathways on the outcome of the RBMP using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as an MCDA method, (2) the scaling effects considering water body, sub-catchment, and river basin scales, and (3) the effect of using global and local criteria weighing on the final ranking of alternatives. We propose two approaches to aggregate ranks for the entire basin: using non-dominated alternatives only and using a normalized TOPSIS relative closeness value. The results show no variation in the final non-dominated alternative for both aggregation pathways. However, we note rank reversal among the dominated alternatives. These results suggest that scaling effects need to be considered in spatial MCDA.

Emerging trends and research frontiers in spatial multicriteria analysis

“…Subsequently, a local ordered weighted averaging (OWA) was proposed by Malczewski and Liu (2014), Xiao et al (2018) and Jiao et al (2019). Şalap-Ayça andJankowski (2016, 2018), Jankowski (2018) and Taha et al (2019) advanced GIS-MCA by developing local forms of reference point methods.…”

“…One way of refining this approach is to use the concept of localized contextual factors within the framework of LMCA. There is some evidence suggesting that the size and shape of a neighbourhood are the critical parameters of LMCA (McHenry and Rinner 2016, Taha et al 2019. The parameters are problem specific and context dependent.…”

“…Every change in the shape and size of zones creates a new set of geographic data (and different set of decision/ evaluation alternatives). Consequently, the results of GIS-MCA are sensitive to the rank reversal problem; that is, the change in ordering/ranking of the alternatives is a consequence of modifying the set of spatially defined alternatives (Nijssen and Schumann 2014, Malczewski and Rinner 2015, Taha et al 2019. Future research can make an important contribution to GIS-MCA by demonstrating how do scale/zonation changes influence the outcomes of GIS-MCA procedures, and examining how MAUP relates to the rank reversal problem.…”

A novel per pixel and object-based ensemble approach for flood susceptibility mapping

“…Owing to the principle of transitivity, a consistent pairwise comparison matrix would mean that if 2a1 > a2 (i.e. a1 is twice more desirable than a2) and 4a2 > a3, then 8a1 > a3 (Taha et al 2019). Inconsistency is well-defined and based on the assumption that kmax > n for comparison matrices and kmax > n, if C is a consistent comparison and the consistency ratio (CR) is defined by Equation 5:…”

Study on the Ecological Operation and Watershed Management of Urban Rivers in Northern China

“…Therefore, watershed management is crucial. Mature watershed management includes the establishment of watershed management institutions, the implementation of coordinated power, and the establishment of a water rights trading market [20][21][22][23]. Current research on watershed management is still in the theory stage in China [24].…”