Scaling effects on the free surface backward facing step flow

Peltonen, Petteri; Kanninen, Pekka; Laurila, Erkki; Vuorinen, Ville

doi:10.1063/5.0045520

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 88 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Flow separation can occur due to geometric singularity [1][2][3][4][5] or adverse pressure gradient [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The two-dimensional backward-facing step has been widely used to generate a geometric-induced flow separation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of shortfin mako shark skin at the reattachment of a separated turbulent boundary layer

Santos,

Lang,

Wahidi

et al. 2024

Bioinspir. Biomim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This smooth flat experimental study investigates the capability of mako shark scales to control flow separation when placed downstream of the onset of turbulent boundary layer separation and within the reattachment region. The objective of the study is to validate the hypothesis that the shark scales’ bristling and recoiling would prevent the flow separation on the flank region (the fastest flow region) of the shark. A rotating cylinder was used to induce an adverse pressure gradient over a flat plate to produce a region of separated flow where the shark skin specimen was mounted. Two types of mako shark scales (flank (B2) and between flank and dorsal fin (B1)) were positioned in the preferred flow direction on a flat plate. The B2 scales are slender, 200 μm tall, and can bristle up to 50°. In contrast, B1 scales are wider, shorter, and can bristle at 30º. The bristling angle and shape are the main mechanisms by which the scales act to inhibit flow from moving upstream near the wall. Thus, the difference in the bristling angles and structures of the scales is attributed to the fact that the B2 scales function in a thicker boundary layer (behind the shark's gills) where they must bristle sufficiently high into the boundary layer to control the flow separation, and because the adverse pressure gradient in this region is higher where flow separation is more likely. The scales are placed in the reattachment region to elucidate their ability to control and reattach an already separated turbulent flow. The results show that B2 scales placed in the reattachment region reduce the size of the turbulent separation bubble and decrease the turbulent kinetic energy, while B1 scales have the opposite effect.

show abstract