Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Functional Traits from Leaves to Canopies

Abstract: In this chapter, we begin by exploring the relationship between plant functional traits and functional diversity and how this relates to the characterization and monitoring of global plant biodiversity. We then discuss the connection between leaf functional traits and their resulting optical properties (i.e., reflectance, transmittance, and absorption) and how this related to remote sensing (RS) of functional diversity. Building on this, we briefly discuss the history of RS of functional traits using spectrosc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(328 reference statements)
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…leaf area index and leaf angle distribution) (Asner, 1998; Roberts et al ., 2004; Ollinger, 2011). At the same time, other challenges to spaceborne retrieval of V c,max25 are associated with a multitude of issues, including sensor design, uncertainties in the retrieval of surface reflectance, the sun‐sensor geometry effect, and the mixture effect associated with the spatial resolution issue (Roberts et al ., 2004; Thompson et al ., 2019; Serbin & Townsend, 2020). Therefore, additional research is needed to understand the impacts of these issues on satellite retrievals of V c,max25 , yet new opportunities in spaceborne image spectroscopy could yield new insights (Guanter et al ., 2015; Stavros et al ., 2017; Schimel & Poulter, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…leaf area index and leaf angle distribution) (Asner, 1998; Roberts et al ., 2004; Ollinger, 2011). At the same time, other challenges to spaceborne retrieval of V c,max25 are associated with a multitude of issues, including sensor design, uncertainties in the retrieval of surface reflectance, the sun‐sensor geometry effect, and the mixture effect associated with the spatial resolution issue (Roberts et al ., 2004; Thompson et al ., 2019; Serbin & Townsend, 2020). Therefore, additional research is needed to understand the impacts of these issues on satellite retrievals of V c,max25 , yet new opportunities in spaceborne image spectroscopy could yield new insights (Guanter et al ., 2015; Stavros et al ., 2017; Schimel & Poulter, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, leaf reflectance spectroscopy or the measurement of reflected radiance from leaves in many narrow, continuous spectral channels across a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (Serbin & Townsend, 2020), may fill an important role in enhancing our understanding of trait variation within and across Earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Leaf reflectance spectra are a collection of optical properties that are linked to a large number of leaf morphological and biochemical characteristics by electronic and vibrational absorption (Curran, 1989; Elvidge, 1990; Kokaly et al ., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different plant species respond in their own way to incoming solar radiation according to their pigment, water, and biochemical content, as well as leaf and canopy structure. Thus, the variability in the remotely sensed spectra might enable detection of plant species diversity [13][14][15][16][17]. This concept represents the basis of the spectral variability hypothesis (SVH): as the number of plant species increases for a given area, the spectral diversity observed from that area should also increase [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the specific signals associated with Rubisco ( V cmax ) or, cytochrome b6f ( J max ), are likely to be a minor component of the overall reflectance signal associated with other constituents of the leaves [ 37 ]. Assumption 2), a more likely assumption, is that the PLSR captures a range of direct and indirect correlations among a host of leaf traits and properties also known to influence leaf reflectance [ 67 ] to enable the estimation of the net photosynthetic parameters. That is, the PLSR method develops a model based on the strongest covariance between the reflectance spectra and response variable so direct or indirect correlations between the response variable and other traits are likely to be equally captured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%