2015
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2015.8.1707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling limit for the kernel of the spectral projector and remainder estimates in the pointwise Weyl law

Abstract: Abstract. Let (M, g) be a compact smooth Riemannian manifold. We obtain new off-diagonal estimates as λ → ∞ for the remainder in the pointwise Weyl Law for the kernel of the spectral projector of the Laplacian onto functions with frequency at most λ. A corollary is that, when rescaled around a non self-focal point, the kernel of the spectral projector onto the frequency interval (λ, λ + 1] has a universal scaling limit as λ → ∞ (depending only on the dimension of M ). Our results also imply that if M has no co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following semiclassical approximation, universal w.r.t. M holds (see [8, Section 2.1] with case α = 1 due to Canzani-Hanin [3,4]): where A α = {w : α ≤ |w| ≤ 1} and in the case α = 1 the n-dimensional measure dξ is replaced by (n − 1)-dimensional surface measure on the unit sphere.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following semiclassical approximation, universal w.r.t. M holds (see [8, Section 2.1] with case α = 1 due to Canzani-Hanin [3,4]): where A α = {w : α ≤ |w| ≤ 1} and in the case α = 1 the n-dimensional measure dξ is replaced by (n − 1)-dimensional surface measure on the unit sphere.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That result was in turn was based on the work of Sogge-Zelditch [18,19], who studied j = k = 0 and x = y. This last situation was also studied (independently and significantly before [4,18,19]) by Safarov in [12] (cf [13]) using a somewhat different method. The case j = k = 1 and x = y is essentially Proposition 2.3 in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our main technical result, Theorem 2, shows that the remainder estimate (5) for R(x, y, λ) can be improved from O(λ n−1+j+k ) to o(λ n−1+j+k ) under the assumption that x and y are near a non self-focal point (defined below). This paper is a continuation of [4] where the authors proved Theorem 2 for j = k = 0. An application of our improved remainder estimates is Theorem 1, which shows that we can compute the scaling limit of E (λ,λ+1] (x, y) and its derivatives near a non self-focal point as λ → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the wave equation in this way may break down when T d(x, y) is unbounded. For larger distances we instead appeal to the results of Canzani-Hanin [7]. Their Theorem 2 improves the O(T n−1 ) error term in Hörmander's estimate for K(x, y) to o(T n−1 ), assuming x, y are in a ball B r (z) of radius r → 0 arbitrarily slowly around some non-self-focal point z.…”
Section: Input From Semiclassicsmentioning
confidence: 99%