2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-004-0401-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling limits of equilibrium wetting models in (1+1)–dimension

Abstract: We study the path properties for the δ-pinning wetting model in (1 + 1)-dimension. In other terms, we consider a random walk model with fairly general continuous increments conditioned to stay in the upper half plane and with a δ-measure reward for touching zero, that is the boundary of the forbidden region. It is well known that such a model displays a localization/delocalization transition, according to the size of the reward. Our focus is on getting a precise pathwise description of the system, in both the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the localized phase it is known [24,2] that the laws of S N under P λ,h N,ω r are tight, which means that the polymer is essentially at O(1) distance from the x-axis. The situation is completely different in the (interior of the) delocalized phase, where one expects that S N = O( √ N ): in fact the conjectured path behavior (motivated by the analogy with the known results for non disordered models, see in particular [21], [11] and [8]) should be weak convergence under diffusive scaling to the Brownian meander process (that is Brownian motion conditioned to stay positive on the interval [0, 1], see [23]). Therefore in the (interior of the) delocalized phase the law of S N / √ N under P λ,h N,ω r should converge weakly to the corresponding marginal of the Brownian meander, whose law has density x exp(−x 2 /2)1 (x≥0) .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the localized phase it is known [24,2] that the laws of S N under P λ,h N,ω r are tight, which means that the polymer is essentially at O(1) distance from the x-axis. The situation is completely different in the (interior of the) delocalized phase, where one expects that S N = O( √ N ): in fact the conjectured path behavior (motivated by the analogy with the known results for non disordered models, see in particular [21], [11] and [8]) should be weak convergence under diffusive scaling to the Brownian meander process (that is Brownian motion conditioned to stay positive on the interval [0, 1], see [23]). Therefore in the (interior of the) delocalized phase the law of S N / √ N under P λ,h N,ω r should converge weakly to the corresponding marginal of the Brownian meander, whose law has density x exp(−x 2 /2)1 (x≥0) .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However they give at the same time still a weak information on the paths, above all if compared to what is available for non disordered models, see e.g. [21], [11], [8] and references therein, namely Brownian scaling, which in turn is a consequence of the fact that all the visits in the unfavorable solvent happen very close to the boundary points, that is the origin, under the measure P λ,h N,ω . In non disordered models one can in fact prove that the polymer becomes transient and that it visits the unfavorable solvent, or any point below a fixed level, only a finite number of times.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, based on what is known on non-disordered models, see e.g. [9] and [14], it is tempting to conjecture the following scenario: for h > h c (λ) C.1 there are only a finite number of visits to the unfavorable solvent, that is P( dω)-a.s. lim , with S distributed according to P f N,ω , converges weakly as N → ∞ to the law of the Brownian meander, that is the law of a standard Brownian process conditioned not to enter the lower half plane. The standard reference for the Brownian meander is [17].…”
Section: Further Results and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same theorem tells us that, if R n := max ℓ − k : k and ℓ even , 0 ≤ k < ℓ ≤ n, Notice that the longest atypical stretch, in the sense of (4.6), for n = τ N ranges from τ N − R τ N to τ N , so The second inequality holds for N sufficiently large. Now we set δ := sup 9) and observe that sup q<h (−2λq − Σ h (q)) is positive if and only if sup q∈R (−2λq − Σ h (q)) is positive. The latter expression is the Legendre transform of Σ h (·) and therefore it coincides with −2λh+log M(2λ), which is positive for h < h(λ).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the one dimensional case where both fluctuations and repulsion are of the same size, one can see that starting from equilibrium in a box of size N , the properly rescaled space-time process converges as N → ∞ to reflected partial stochastic differential equation of the Nualard-Pardoux type, cf. [18], [30], [12].…”
Section: The Landau Ginzburg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%