1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01555907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling rapidity distribution for hadrons from $$\bar pp$$ ande + e ? collision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…energy dependence but not of the midrapidity density when comparing heavy-ion/e + e − data to those from pp/pp collisions. We recall that the energy-scaling factor 1/3, has already been shown in [78,79] to give good agreement of the pp mean multiplicity data relative to those from e + e − annihilation, for a review see [1]. It is remarkable that the 3NLO perturbative QCD [80] fit to e + e − data [81] describes the pp/pp multiplicity data providing the inelasticity is set to ≈ 0.35 [57], favouring the effective 1/3 c.m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…energy dependence but not of the midrapidity density when comparing heavy-ion/e + e − data to those from pp/pp collisions. We recall that the energy-scaling factor 1/3, has already been shown in [78,79] to give good agreement of the pp mean multiplicity data relative to those from e + e − annihilation, for a review see [1]. It is remarkable that the 3NLO perturbative QCD [80] fit to e + e − data [81] describes the pp/pp multiplicity data providing the inelasticity is set to ≈ 0.35 [57], favouring the effective 1/3 c.m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…energy dependence but not of the midrapidity density when comparing heavy-ion/e + e − data to those from pp/pp collisions. We recall that the energy-scaling factor 1/3, has already been shown in [57,58] to give good agreement of the pp mean multiplicity data relative to those from e + e − annihilation, for a review see [1]. It is remarkable that the 3NLO perturbative QCD [3] fit to e + e − data [59] describes the pp/pp multiplicity data providing the inelasticity is set to ≈ 0.35 [50], favouring the effective 1/3 c.m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It has been speculated that E eff or correspondingly the inelasticity K = E eff / √ s are related to the 3-quark structure of the nucleon [100,101,102]. In this simple picture the interaction of one of the three valence quarks in each nucleon would correspond to an average inelasticity K ≈ 1/3.…”
Section: Universality Of Multiplicities In P + P(p) and E + E −mentioning
confidence: 99%