2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-3701-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling, similarity, and the fourth paradigm for hydrology

Abstract: Abstract. In this synthesis paper addressing hydrologic scaling and similarity, we posit that roadblocks in the search for universal laws of hydrology are hindered by our focus on computational simulation (the third paradigm) and assert that it is time for hydrology to embrace a fourth paradigm of dataintensive science. Advances in information-based hydrologic science, coupled with an explosion of hydrologic data and advances in parameter estimation and modeling, have laid the foundation for a data-driven fram… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above-mentioned challenges that we face in estimating key physical parameters in LSMs/HMs have been intensively discussed in many studies Bierkens et al, 2014;Bierkens, 2015;Clark et al, 2016Clark et al, , 2017Mizukami et al, 2017;Peters-Lidard et al, 2017). To further visualize the problems and to understand the deficiencies of current parameterization techniques, we selected a representative sample of LSMs/HMs used for research and/or operational purposes, namely CABLE, CLM, JULES, LISFLOOD, Noah-MP, mHM, PCR-GLOBWB, WaterGAP2 (30 arcmin), Wa-terGAP3 (5 arcmin), CHTESSEL, and HBV.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Soil Porosity and Available Water Capacimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned challenges that we face in estimating key physical parameters in LSMs/HMs have been intensively discussed in many studies Bierkens et al, 2014;Bierkens, 2015;Clark et al, 2016Clark et al, , 2017Mizukami et al, 2017;Peters-Lidard et al, 2017). To further visualize the problems and to understand the deficiencies of current parameterization techniques, we selected a representative sample of LSMs/HMs used for research and/or operational purposes, namely CABLE, CLM, JULES, LISFLOOD, Noah-MP, mHM, PCR-GLOBWB, WaterGAP2 (30 arcmin), Wa-terGAP3 (5 arcmin), CHTESSEL, and HBV.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Soil Porosity and Available Water Capacimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is in the spirit of linking patterns to processes (Sivapalan, 2005), and of using data-intensive science as a timely and promising paradigm for advancing hydrological science (Peters-Lidard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both hydrological and remote sensing research progress, it is prudent that we (at least initially) seek the middle ground, where the development of machine-learning methods might be guided by theoretical constraints and understanding, and that they be used to complement or improve more traditional physically based models, which in turn can add interpretability with regard to the underlying processes. Regardless, the opportunities being presented by these new and innovative approaches are likely to challenge our concept of hydrology as a discipline, especially as the exploration of interdisciplinary datasets provide new insights and understanding to hydrological processes and behaviour: a topic that is expanded upon in the context of a fourth paradigm in hydrology, as discussed in Peters-Lidard et al (2017).…”
Section: Cloud Computing and Data Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%