2014
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling the Digital Divide: Home Computer Technology and Student Achievement

Abstract: Does differential access to computer technology at home compound the educational disparities between rich and poor? Would a program of government provision of computers to early secondary school students reduce these disparities? We use administrative data on North Carolina public school students to corroborate earlier surveys that document broad racial and socioeconomic gaps in home computer access and use. Using within‐student variation in home computer access, and across‐ZIP code variation in the timing of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although digital divide conceptions define Internet access in terms of race and class disparities (e.g., Ginossar & Nelson, 2010;Jeffres, Neuendorf, & Atkin, 2012;Laz & Berenson, 2013;Lee, Ramirez, Leis, Gray, & Hornik, 2012;Pingree & Hawkins, 1996;Rice & Katz, 2001; van Dijk, 2005van Dijk, , 2006Vigdor & Ladd, 2010;Vishwanath et al, 2006), the concept also encompasses psychological factors determining computer use (e.g., Eastin & LaRose, 2000;Han et al, 2009;Ruppel & Rains, 2012;Whitten, Kreps, & Eastin, 2009). Dupagne and Salwen (2005) emphasize the critical public policy debate driving this issue, one defined in terms of disparities in internet access among different social groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although digital divide conceptions define Internet access in terms of race and class disparities (e.g., Ginossar & Nelson, 2010;Jeffres, Neuendorf, & Atkin, 2012;Laz & Berenson, 2013;Lee, Ramirez, Leis, Gray, & Hornik, 2012;Pingree & Hawkins, 1996;Rice & Katz, 2001; van Dijk, 2005van Dijk, , 2006Vigdor & Ladd, 2010;Vishwanath et al, 2006), the concept also encompasses psychological factors determining computer use (e.g., Eastin & LaRose, 2000;Han et al, 2009;Ruppel & Rains, 2012;Whitten, Kreps, & Eastin, 2009). Dupagne and Salwen (2005) emphasize the critical public policy debate driving this issue, one defined in terms of disparities in internet access among different social groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research (e.g., Chakraborty & Bosman, 2005;Ginossar & Nelson, 2010;Hargittai, 2009;Lee, 2009;NTIA, 2010;Pew, 2012;Rice & Katz, 2003;Vigdor & Ladd, 2010) suggests that home Personal Computer (PC) ownership and Internet access are two key challenges defining the digital divide. To the extent that online health applications can enhance preventative healthcare-and even supplement costlier in-person treatment interventions-wider diffusion of online health affordances could help curtail skyrocketing medical costs (e.g., Han et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. Interestingly, Vigdor and Ladd's (2010) research suggests that home computer access might not necessarily improve educational outcomes for children in middle school. 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%