2008
DOI: 10.22459/ahr.45.2008.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling the Rural: Reflections on Rural Cultural Studies

Abstract: How can cultural analysis be brought to bear on the rural? This central question for rural cultural studies prompts our exploration of how the rural has been delineated and interpreted in the developed West, as a departure for thinking about new intellectual approaches to rurality that span spaces, times and academic disciplines. In this paper we adopt a broad schema, discussing insights from rural studies, cultural geography and history. As Michael Woods (Rural Geography) has handily pointed out, 'rural' is

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Settler myths of regional Australia as “the outback” or “the bush” still forge normative meanings and practices of being and becoming a “man” in many country towns and regional centres as able‐bodied, heroic, strong, independent, “white” and heterosexual. A particular Australian version of masculinity is performed through everyday practices which, in turn, ensures heterosexuality is normalised and enforced in most regional towns and localities (Gorman‐Murray, Darian‐Smith and Gibson 2008; Gottschalk and Newton 2003). Moreover, against changing ideas about both masculinity and sexuality in Australia—such as metrosexuality and the progressive decriminalisation of sodomy, awarding of legal rights to sexual minorities and increased visibility of gay and lesbian facilities in some (more gentrified or tourism‐orientated) country towns and cities—there is a significant number of young men attempting to reclaim and protect understandings of masculinity forged by the bushman mythology.…”
Section: Interpreting Home Mobility and Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Settler myths of regional Australia as “the outback” or “the bush” still forge normative meanings and practices of being and becoming a “man” in many country towns and regional centres as able‐bodied, heroic, strong, independent, “white” and heterosexual. A particular Australian version of masculinity is performed through everyday practices which, in turn, ensures heterosexuality is normalised and enforced in most regional towns and localities (Gorman‐Murray, Darian‐Smith and Gibson 2008; Gottschalk and Newton 2003). Moreover, against changing ideas about both masculinity and sexuality in Australia—such as metrosexuality and the progressive decriminalisation of sodomy, awarding of legal rights to sexual minorities and increased visibility of gay and lesbian facilities in some (more gentrified or tourism‐orientated) country towns and cities—there is a significant number of young men attempting to reclaim and protect understandings of masculinity forged by the bushman mythology.…”
Section: Interpreting Home Mobility and Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing the concept of an agrarian imaginary, scholars have been inspired by the cultural turn in rural studies since the 1990s, recognising the importance of culture within rurality and its definitions (Gorman-Murray et al, 2008; Valentine, 2001) and focusing attention on representations of the rural. For example, Bell (2007) distinguishes between two types of ‘rural’.…”
Section: Place and The Rural Imaginarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, definitions of rurality are most readily available through personal experience and by gathering accounts of spaces that are marked as 'rural' (Pratt 1996;Gorman-Murray et al 2008). Consequently, definitions of rurality are most readily available through personal experience and by gathering accounts of spaces that are marked as 'rural' (Pratt 1996;Gorman-Murray et al 2008).…”
Section: Gender and 'The Rural'mentioning
confidence: 99%