2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(22)00006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling up access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): should nurses do the job?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the identified PrEP services for people who inject drugs required an HIV or sexual health specialist doctor to prescribe PrEP. However, task sharing with nurses in clinics and community settings to lead PrEP services, including prescribing, has the potential to increase PrEP access, uptake and persistence and generate health system efficiencies [ 29 ] and has been implemented in South Africa. Along with appropriate training and support, nurse-led models could be an effective option for providing PrEP for people who inject drugs, including within broader HIV, tuberculosis and STI prevention, diagnosis and treatment services, and in services for HCV infection, particularly where nurses work with civil society organizations providing harm reduction services to people who inject drugs and other key populations and so tend to be familiar with the legal, socio-cultural, political, and health contexts for people who inject drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the identified PrEP services for people who inject drugs required an HIV or sexual health specialist doctor to prescribe PrEP. However, task sharing with nurses in clinics and community settings to lead PrEP services, including prescribing, has the potential to increase PrEP access, uptake and persistence and generate health system efficiencies [ 29 ] and has been implemented in South Africa. Along with appropriate training and support, nurse-led models could be an effective option for providing PrEP for people who inject drugs, including within broader HIV, tuberculosis and STI prevention, diagnosis and treatment services, and in services for HCV infection, particularly where nurses work with civil society organizations providing harm reduction services to people who inject drugs and other key populations and so tend to be familiar with the legal, socio-cultural, political, and health contexts for people who inject drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providers, particularly from less well-resourced settings, also expressed concerns about human resource capacity to provide an injection-based intervention that required relatively frequent clinic visits. While task sharing can facilitate the delivery of PrEP services [10], participants in our consultations raised concerns about regulatory restrictions regarding who can administer intramuscular injections, and management of possible side effects or any drug-drug interactions. These issues are related to broader concerns about how the integration of CAB-LA could lead to a remedicalization of PrEP services -requiring more clinic visits and staff who can administer injections -and undermine some bene ts of community-based PrEP services, especially for stigmatized populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WHO has published guidance to support differentiated PrEP services [5], using a framework of four building blocks of differentiated service delivery: service location (where), frequency (when), package (what), and provider (who). Examples of service adaptations within those building blocks include community-, pharmacy-, and home-based PrEP delivery ("where") [6,7], multi-month dispensing to reduce follow-up visits ("when") [8], integrated services ("what") [9], and task sharing with various health worker cadres and lay providers ("who") [10]. The use of HIV self-testing (HIVST) has supported many of these differentiated PrEP service delivery models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, although the COVID-19 pandemic restricted sex workers’ access to clinical services in many settings, it also led to loosening of prescribing and distribution restrictions, accelerating scale-up of DSD approaches to PrEP [54 ▪ ]. Other distribution-related developments include combining PrEP with self-test kits, task-shifting to nurses or peer volunteers [60,61 ▪▪ ]. These approaches have not been designed specifically for sex workers, but would meet many of their needs that relate to documented barriers to their regular attendance at set appointment times that may not fit with their travel and work schedules, or necessitate long waiting times, frequently in locations where they fear being recognized as sex workers [62–66].…”
Section: New Developments and Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%