Scaling-up an integrated care for patients with non-communicable diseases: An analysis of healthcare barriers and facilitators in Slovenia and Belgium

Abstract

Introduction Although the concept of integrated care for non-communicable diseases was introduced at the primary level to move from disease-centered to patient-centered care, it has only been partially implemented in European countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare identified facilitators and barriers to scale-up this concept between Slovenia and Belgium. Methods This was a qualitative study. Fifteen focus groups and fifty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders at the micro, meso and macro levels. In addition, data from two previously published studies were used for the analysis. Data collection and analysis was initially conducted at country level. Finally, the data was evaluated by a cross-country team to assess similarities and differences between countries. Results Four topics were identified in the study: patient-centered care, teamwork, coordination of care and task delegation. Despite the different contexts, true teamwork and patient-centered care are limited in both countries by hierarchies and a very heavily skewed medical approach. The organization of primary healthcare in Slovenia probably facilitates the coordination of care, which is not the case in Belgium. The financing and organization of primary practices in Belgium was identified as a barrier to the implementation of task delegation between health professionals. Conclusions This study allowed formulating some important concepts for future healthcare for non-communicable diseases at the level of primary healthcare. The results could provide useful insights for other countries with similar health systems.

Perceptions of the primary health care team about the implementation of integrated care of patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Slovenia: qualitative study

“…Because most participants in our study reported a lack of information, there is a need for better information flow between levels of care and with certain other professionals or institutions (dietitians, collaboration between family medicine practice and nursing home), for example, by sharing data and allowing online meetings [ 22 ]. This would facilitate integration and improve integrated patient care.…”

“…SCUBY is an international research project funded by the EU under the Horizon2020 Framework Programme with contract number 825432 - SCUBY. Some of the results from the SCUBY project have already been published [ 22 ].…”

Nursing Care Coordination in Primary Healthcare for Patients with Complex Needs: A Comparative Case Study

“…Studies reporting on similar initiatives show better health outcomes and reduction in preventable hospitalizations and emergency departments use [ 58 ]. Yet, the implementation and the sustainability of such initiatives have proved challenging over the years [ 17 59 60 ]. Key informants from both programs reflected on these challenges in the Quebec context, offering a better understanding of the elements that facilitate and hinder such initiatives and enabling comparisons across countries.…”

Peer Support as Part of Scaling-Up Integrated Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Arterial Hypertension at the Primary Healthcare Level: A Study Protocol

“…Nowadays, there is still a lack of optimal care for chronically ill patients, especially for members of vulnerable groups ( 6 ). Research in Slovenia discovered that one possible cause of this is the low level of patient empowerment and suboptimal implementation of teamwork and coordinated care, which must approach the patient and move from healthcare institutions to each patient’s local and home environment ( 12 , 13 ). Primary healthcare in Slovenia needs improved measures to support self-management of chronically ill patients ( 13 ).…”