2021
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2021.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Up and Out HIV Prevention and Behavioral Health Services to Latino Sexual Minority Men in South Florida: Multi-Level Implementation Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our formative research (the DÍMELO study) with LMSM and stakeholders (individuals who delivered HIV-prevention and behavioral health treatments to LMSM in South Florida) identified barriers and facilitators that need to be addressed to increase the reach of these services to LMSM. The qualitative aim of DÍMELO included LMSM (∼50% born outside the United States) and stakeholders and identified implementation determinants (Harkness et al, 2021a) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al, 2009). Key determinants of HIV-prevention and behavioral health treatment use among LMSM included complexity of service access, perceived benefits of services, policies influencing service availability, patient needs and resources that could affect service use (e.g., transportation, education, immigration status, mental health/substance use), peer influence (e.g., peer stigma vs. normalization), LMSM and provider knowledge, provider/organizational relationships (e.g., stigma vs. affirmation, trust, personalism), and the availability of services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, our formative research (the DÍMELO study) with LMSM and stakeholders (individuals who delivered HIV-prevention and behavioral health treatments to LMSM in South Florida) identified barriers and facilitators that need to be addressed to increase the reach of these services to LMSM. The qualitative aim of DÍMELO included LMSM (∼50% born outside the United States) and stakeholders and identified implementation determinants (Harkness et al, 2021a) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al, 2009). Key determinants of HIV-prevention and behavioral health treatment use among LMSM included complexity of service access, perceived benefits of services, policies influencing service availability, patient needs and resources that could affect service use (e.g., transportation, education, immigration status, mental health/substance use), peer influence (e.g., peer stigma vs. normalization), LMSM and provider knowledge, provider/organizational relationships (e.g., stigma vs. affirmation, trust, personalism), and the availability of services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LMSM experienced 22% of all new HIV diagnoses in 2019 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). Yet, evidence-based interventions, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), have not been sufficiently scaled up and out to LMSM (Blashill et al, 2020; Harkness et al, 2021b; Kimball et al, 2020). PrEP use in the past year was reported by only 28% of US-born LMSM (Trujillo, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many directors of MBHOs, including those who advertise services to LGBTQ+ people, perceive a high need for LGBTQ+ mental health care and report the need for more LGBTQ+ affirmative staff and related resources (Pachankis et al, 2021). In particular, mental health services and related implementation research are needed to address the needs of LGBTQ+ subpopulations such as Latino/a/x/e sexual minority men at high risk for HIV (Harkness et al, 2021), older adults (Goldhammer et al, 2019; Holman et al, 2020), persons in rural areas (Willging et al, 2016), and veterans (Valentine et al, 2021). Our results illuminate both opportunities and challenges in strategies to improving LGBTQ+ affirming care in community MBHOs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to MITI, our study identified patients' diabetes stigma as an implementation barrier. Half (52%) of patients with type 2 diabetes report feeling stigmatized [34] and disease-related stigma has been identified as a barrier to patients signing up for health services in other contexts including HIV and mental health [35,36]. Engaging patients to develop strategies sensitive to stigma can help mitigate this barrier [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%