“…It is a historic strength of Family Process that it contains key writings that challenged the prevailing social order even within its own community, as well as more broadly promoting social activism in relation to injustice. We are fortunate to have published such articles as: Watts‐Jones’ () exploration of how location of self and privilege affects therapy; Watts‐Jones, Ali, Alfaro, and Frederick () on mentoring trainees and therapists from diverse cultures accentuating social justice issues; Hernandez‐Wolfe and McDowell () on the location of trainers in relation to social justice; Waldegrave's () call for explicit inclusion of oppression and injustice as foci in therapy; Hernández, Almeida, and Dolan‐Del Vecchio's () description of their cultural competence model focused on accountability, critical consciousness, and empowerment; Charlés (, ) on family therapy in conflict zones; Rojano () on community family therapy; Falicov () on working with transnational immigrants; Sluzki () on the influence of political repression on therapeutic dialogue; Goldner, Penn, Sheinberg, and Walker () and George and Stith () on feminism in relation to intimate partner violence; and Addison and Coolhart () and Malpas () on social action therapies focused on LGBTQ couples and families. Other articles in Family Process have accentuated social action in research, as in Bava, Coffey, Weingarten, and Becker () on action research surrounding the Katrina hurricane; Baumann, Rodríguez, and Parra‐Cardona's () paper about the need for an activist perspective when conducting research on immigrant populations; and D'Arrigo‐Patrick, Hoff, Knudson‐Martin, and Tuttle's () summary of expert opinions about how to bring activism to family therapy.…”