Scaling up from epidemiology to biogeography: local infection patterns predict geographical distribution in fish parasites

Abstract

Aim We investigated how the spatial distribution of parasites, measured as either their geographical range size or their frequency of occurrence among localities, relates to either their average local abundance or the variance in their abundance among localities where they occur. Location We used data on the abundance of 46 metazoan parasite species in 66 populations of threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, from Europe and North America. Methods For each parasite species, frequency of occurrence was calculated as the proportion of stickleback populations in which it occurred, and geographical range size as the area within the smallest possible polygon delimited using the coordinates of the localities where it occurred. Generalized linear models were used to assess how these two measures of spatial distribution were influenced by several predictor variables: geographical region (North America or Europe), life cycle (simple or complex), average local abundance, the coefficient of variation in abundance across localities, and median prevalence (proportion of infected hosts within a locality). Results Our analyses uncovered four patterns. First, parasites in North America tend to have higher frequencies of occurrence among surveyed localities, but not broader geographical ranges, than those in Europe. Second, parasite species with simple life cycles have wider geographical ranges than those with complex cycles. Third, there was a positive relationship between average abundance of the different parasite species and their frequency of occurrence, but not between average abundance and geographical range size. Fourth, the coefficient of variation in abundance covaried positively with both the frequency of occurrence and geographical range size across the different parasite species. Thus, all else being equal, parasites showing greater site‐to‐site variability in abundance occur in a greater proportion of localities and over a broader geographical area than those with a more stable abundance among sites. Main conclusions Local infection patterns are linked with large‐scale distributional patterns in fish parasites, independently of host effects, such that local commonness translates into regional commonness. The mechanisms linking parasite success at both scales remain unclear, but may include those that maintain the continuum between specialist and generalist parasites. Regardless, the observed patterns have implications for the predicted changes in the geographical distributions of many parasites in response to climate change.

Biogeography of parasitism in freshwater fish: spatial patterns in hot spots of infection

“…Typically, species with high local abundance are more widely distributed across localities in any environment. The same pattern applies to parasite communities investigated to date (Barker et al , Cone et al , Poulin et al , Thieltges et al ). Different causal pathways have been proposed to explain this common pattern.…”

“…In addition, long distance transport of invertebrates via water birds could also promote sporadic movement of parasites in their intermediate hosts across water bodies. Parasites constrained to freshwater habitats may then be subjected to sporadic dispersal in which locally abundant species have an advantage (Poulin et al ) by having a higher chance of acting as source of colonisers to new localities in a metapopulation context. In addition, Poulin et al () found that species with high occupancy also have more variable local abundances, suggesting they can maintain populations through a larger range of different environments.…”

Evaluating the role of regional and local processes in structuring a larval trematode metacommunity of Helisoma trivolvis

“…Logue et al (2011) argued that mass eff ects and species sorting cannot be distinguished without direct measurement of dispersal. Similarly, Poulin et al (2012) found that generalist parasites had larger geographic ranges relative to specialist parasites in a fi sh -parasite system. In our study system, we found evidence that local niche factors were most important in determining metacommunity structure and species richness.…”

Gall-forming protistan parasites infect southern bull kelp across the Southern Ocean, with prevalence increasing to the south

“…Despite our low sample numbers and limited sampling range, geographic variability in infection prevalence suggests parasite susceptibility to local conditions (Poulin et al 2012), and several possibilities could explain the observed patterns, as follows.…”

“…Pathogen transmission can increase with higher densities and greater connectivity between hosts (Poulin et al 2012, Izhar & Ben-Ami 2015. Durvillaea species in Australia are known to transition from being a relatively rare intertidal element at Tathra (the northern range limit) to a dominant habitatforming species on rocky intertidal platforms in Tasmania (southern part of the species' range) (Millar 2007).…”