2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling up Inference in MLNs with Spark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where n i (⋅, ⋅) is the satisfaction of the i th ground rule. Since the potentials measure the satisfaction of the ground rules, the ŝ is set to one and the MAP inference objective in MLNs can be expressed as a weighted count of the number of satisfied ground rules: Many implementations of MLNs exist (Noessner et al 2013;Shavlik and Natarajan 2009;Niu et al 2011;Venugopal et al 2016;Islam et al 2018). In this paper we are interested in understanding how different weight learning techniques effect the quality of predictions, rather than the efficiency of inference.…”
Section: Markov Logic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n i (⋅, ⋅) is the satisfaction of the i th ground rule. Since the potentials measure the satisfaction of the ground rules, the ŝ is set to one and the MAP inference objective in MLNs can be expressed as a weighted count of the number of satisfied ground rules: Many implementations of MLNs exist (Noessner et al 2013;Shavlik and Natarajan 2009;Niu et al 2011;Venugopal et al 2016;Islam et al 2018). In this paper we are interested in understanding how different weight learning techniques effect the quality of predictions, rather than the efficiency of inference.…”
Section: Markov Logic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%