Scaling-up primary health care-based prevention and management of heavy drinking at the municipal level in middle-income countries in Latin America: Background and protocol for a three-country quasi-experimental study

Abstract

Background: While primary health care (PHC)-based prevention and management of heavy drinking is clinically effective and cost-effective, it remains poorly implemented in routine practice. Systematic reviews and multi-country studies have demonstrated the ability of training and support programmes to increase PHC-based screening and brief advice activity to reduce heavy drinking. However, gains have been only modest and short term at best. WHO studies have concluded that a more effective uptake could be achieved by embedding PHC activity within broader community and municipal support. Protocol: A quasi-experimental study will compare PHC-based prevention and management of heavy drinking in three intervention cities from Colombia, Mexico and Peru with three comparator cities from the same countries. In the implementation cities, primary health care units (PHCUs) will receive training embedded within ongoing supportive municipal action over an 18-month implementation period. In the comparator cities, practice as usual will continue at both municipal and PHCU levels. The primary outcome will be the proportion of consulting adult patients intervened with (screened and advice given to screen positives). The study is powered to detect a doubling of the outcome measure from an estimated 2.5/1,000 patients at baseline. Formal evaluation points will be at baseline, mid-point and end-point of the 18-month implementation period. We will present the ratio (plus 95% confidence interval) of the proportion of patients receiving intervention in the implementation cities with the proportions in the comparator cities. Full process evaluation will be undertaken, coupled with an analysis of potential contextual, financial and political-economy influencing factors. Discussion: This multi-country study will test the extent to which embedding PHC-based prevention and management of alcohol use disorder with supportive municipal action leads to improved scale-up of more patients with heavy drinking receiving appropriate advice and treatment. Study status: The four-year study will start on 1 st December 2017.

Impact of Training and Municipal Support on Primary Health Care–Based Measurement of Alcohol Consumption in Three Latin American Countries: 5-Month Outcome Results of the Quasi-experimental Randomized SCALA Trial

“…The clinical package, tailored for local use, comprised measurement instruments, patient information and advice material, and provider guidance material, with the differences between the standard (more intense) and less intense clinical materials described in the published protocol 35 . The less intense version was a simplified version of standard UK-based materials 49 , deliverable in a reduced period of time, noting evidence that the duration of brief advice has little impact on outcome 7 , 50 , 51 .…”

Treatment for Alcohol Dependence in Primary Care Compared to Outpatient Specialist Treatment—A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…In addition, involvement of other professions than only general practitioners, for example nurses or psychologists, can also enhance implementation (188,191). Currently, great amount of research is focused on implementation, where attention has been drawn to the need of also addressing the context where implementation of alcohol intervention takes place (195).…”

Validation of a screening test for alcohol use, the Russian Federation

“…Since this study's main goal was one of quality improvement in the participating primary health-care facilities without collecting any identifying patient information, it was considered to be part of routine care by participating institutions, except for the specialized addiction care centre, where it underwent ethical review (this is similar to other implementation studies for screening and brief advice/interventions in other countries 22 ). Even though the study was one of quality control, we asked for verbal consent from patients willing to participate.…”