Scaling up sustainability: Concepts and practices of the ecovillage approach

Abstract

Since the Brundtland definition, practitioners and theoreticians have strived to deal with incoherencies in the concept of sustainability or sustainable development, partly because the concept is defined on a global level and applied through local level initiatives. Explanatorily, describing the three sustainability dimensions (social, economic and ecological), the pillar model of sustainability has become popular. However, several authors indicate that a comprehensive understanding, methods and tools on how the dimensions relate to each other in the pillar model of sustainability, are absent. Further, sustainable interventions must express their relations through visible spatial terms and interpret them with the help of values and beliefs that can be handed over to future generations (temporal aspect). Many interventions that are expressed in sustainability dimensions often lack these spatial and temporal considerations. As a result, interventions lack case-and context-specific concerns, objectives, priorities and possibilities, and often seem short-term goal-oriented. Within tensions between global and local, and spatial-temporal necessity, ecovillage is an emerging approach for shaping a sustainable future at grass roots level, and an opportunity to deal with the challenge of managing nature conservation in a community with culturally, socially and economically diverse actors. Hence, the overall objective of this article is to identify concepts and practices of ecovillage as sustainable way of living connected to a context. The attempt is to construe integrative understanding to sustainability and to express spatial and temporal aspects analytically. This understanding can be scaled up to strategies and policies. The article uses a literature review of various secondary sources, journals, narratives, and conference papers on sustainability and ecovillage. The article assumes that it is important to develop the framework analytically prior to empirical research. Findings indicate that to yield sustainable, inclusive and equitable outcomes, it is important to focus on the cultural and regional aspects. This focus can also provide a transition from local to national and global interventions and thereby become a mediator between different levels of sustainability, global and local.

Keeping mass tourism destinations sustainable via urban design: The case of Benidorm

“…This article focuses on local‐level results and consequences derived from the singularity and specificity of the urban model developed in Benidorm; and it is not intended to address the global model of mass tourism as for its impact on sustainability, global warming, climate change or global inequalities. Broaden knowledge on local experiences can contribute to scaling up sustainable, inclusive and equitable outcomes (Singh, Keitsch, & Shrestha, 2019).…”

Consumer Collectives: A History and Reflections on Their Future

“…All of these communities reject untrammeled economic growth and ever-expanding consumption possibilities. Self-produced housing, food, and clothing as well as repurposed and refashioned consumer goods are both vehicles to express these values and the material substrate that sustains these communities (Ergas 2010;Litfin 2014;Brombin 2015;Hong and Vicdan 2016;Singh, Keitsch, and Shrestha 2019;Casey, Lichrou, and O'Malley 2020). A more individualistic variant are the "prepping" networks.…”

African Environmental Ethics: Keys to Sustainable Development Through Agroecological Villages

“…INAT members are examining ecovillage models throughout India to determine whether their ethics would incline them to become members in a global consortium. The idea of an ecovillage has roots in the Indian independence movement with Gandhi’s call to use local resources, and develop indigenous technologies (Singh et al, 2019 ).…”