1990
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/30/1/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalings of energy confinement and density limit in stellarator/heliotron devices

Abstract: The paper presents a study of empirical scaling of energy confinement observed experimentally in stellarator/heliotron devices (Heliotron E, Wendelstein VII-A, L2, Heliotron DR) for plasmas heated by electron cyclotron heating and/or neutral beam injection. The proposed scaling of the gross energy confinement time is: , where P is the absorbed power (MW), n is the line average electron density (1020 m−3), B is the magnetic field strength on the plasma axis (T), a is the average minor radius (m) and R is the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
197
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This density dependence is a feature of anomalous transport, because strong density dependence is also observed in the energy transport, which is governed by anomalous transport. In fact, the global energy confinement shows strong density dependence in CHS, 11 as predicted by LHD scaling 12 ( E ϭ0.17P abs The differences between the parallel viscosity in the original paper and the toroidal viscosity in this paper are discussed. The approximations made in the original paper were a replacement of the Fourier series with (1/M ) ϫ(n -"B/B) and the replacement of toroidal viscosity with parallel viscosity (B ϷB) and (B -"B)/BϷn -"B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This density dependence is a feature of anomalous transport, because strong density dependence is also observed in the energy transport, which is governed by anomalous transport. In fact, the global energy confinement shows strong density dependence in CHS, 11 as predicted by LHD scaling 12 ( E ϭ0.17P abs The differences between the parallel viscosity in the original paper and the toroidal viscosity in this paper are discussed. The approximations made in the original paper were a replacement of the Fourier series with (1/M ) ϫ(n -"B/B) and the replacement of toroidal viscosity with parallel viscosity (B ϷB) and (B -"B)/BϷn -"B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The use of the LID increases pumping of edge-recycled particles and maintains low edge density and high edge electron temperature gradients. The low edge density also allows operation with higher core density than would be the case otherwise: the maximum core density in SDC plasmas is 3 that predicted by the Sudo empirical scaling for heliotron or stellarator devices [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As was discussed in [23], the neoclassical theory [24][25][26][27][28] predicts the following global energy-confinement time-scalings depending on the collisionality. For the so-called plateau regime of intermediate collisionality…”
Section: Global Scalingsmentioning
confidence: 83%