2022
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2021.3116424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scan Context++: Structural Place Recognition Robust to Rotation and Lateral Variations in Urban Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We mainly compare our method with four methods: M2DP [17], Fast Histogram [9], ScanContext [6], and ScanCon-text++ [18]. All methods are implemented using Python.…”
Section: B Comparative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We mainly compare our method with four methods: M2DP [17], Fast Histogram [9], ScanContext [6], and ScanCon-text++ [18]. All methods are implemented using Python.…”
Section: B Comparative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They adopted polar transformation on the point clouds and used the height information as the feature in a polar bin. Recently, Kim et al [18] further enhanced the scan context image to achieve robustness to lateral/rotational changes.…”
Section: A Handcraft Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• As opposed to conventional methods, our method is not limited to only places that are covered by LiDAR maps. [5,6,7,8,9]. GLARE transforms 2D LiDAR scans into histograms and uses the bagof-words framework [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M2DP projects 3D point clouds into multiple 2D planes and uses their densities as descriptors, which are more robust even with the presence of noisy point clouds [6]. The Scan context extracts the highest point for every angle and calculates the distance from the point clouds, outperforming other descriptor-based methods [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%