2007
DOI: 10.1109/ats.2007.4388034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scan Testing for Complete Coverage of Path Delay Faults with Reduced Test Data Volume, Test Application Time, and Hardware Cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scan forest was proposed to reduce test data volume and test application cost for stuck-at fault testing [Xiang et al 2007a]. Xiang et al [2007b] proposed a new scan architecture to compress test data and compact test responses in enhanced scan testing. Most recently, Wu et al [2009] proposed a new method to overcome the launch-induced yield loss in the linear-decompressor-based test data compression environment for LOC delay testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scan forest was proposed to reduce test data volume and test application cost for stuck-at fault testing [Xiang et al 2007a]. Xiang et al [2007b] proposed a new scan architecture to compress test data and compact test responses in enhanced scan testing. Most recently, Wu et al [2009] proposed a new method to overcome the launch-induced yield loss in the linear-decompressor-based test data compression environment for LOC delay testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new scan architecture is suitable for transition fault, path delay fault, and timing-based small delay defect testing. We have used scan forest to compress test data for stuckat tests [Xiang et al 2007a] and reduce test power [Xiang et al 2007b]; however, the scheme to group scan flip-flops for LOC delay testing is completely different. The scan architecture in Xiang et al [2007a] and Xiang et al [2007b] cannot be applied to LOC delay testing directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%