2021
DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2021.1884780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scandal-ridden campaigns: the relationship between cognitive load and candidate evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since decision-makers have limited cognitive capacity, the amount of cognitive load to which they are exposed impacts the outcome of their decisions (Sweller, 2011). Studies show that the increase in cognitive load has a negative impact on performance in various tasks -simple cognitive tasks, such as math problems and number memorization (Deck, Jahedi and Sheremeta, 2021); complex cognitive tasks, such as problem solving or learning (Schrader and Bastiaens, 2012;van Gog, Paas and Sweller, 2010); economic tasks, leading to less risk-taking, stronger anchoring effects and more impulsive decisions (Deck and Jahedi, 2015;Hauge, Brekke, Johansson, Johansson-Stenman and Svedsäter, 2016); as well as voting, such as reducing the impact of politicians' controversies on candidate evaluations or increasing the effects of stereotypes, such as gender or physical appearance (Hart, Ottati and Krumdick, 2011;Nawara and Bailey, 2021). Both full information and naive-nor-mative approach to voting assume that correct voting uses a (relatively) large chunk of an individual's cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Correct Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since decision-makers have limited cognitive capacity, the amount of cognitive load to which they are exposed impacts the outcome of their decisions (Sweller, 2011). Studies show that the increase in cognitive load has a negative impact on performance in various tasks -simple cognitive tasks, such as math problems and number memorization (Deck, Jahedi and Sheremeta, 2021); complex cognitive tasks, such as problem solving or learning (Schrader and Bastiaens, 2012;van Gog, Paas and Sweller, 2010); economic tasks, leading to less risk-taking, stronger anchoring effects and more impulsive decisions (Deck and Jahedi, 2015;Hauge, Brekke, Johansson, Johansson-Stenman and Svedsäter, 2016); as well as voting, such as reducing the impact of politicians' controversies on candidate evaluations or increasing the effects of stereotypes, such as gender or physical appearance (Hart, Ottati and Krumdick, 2011;Nawara and Bailey, 2021). Both full information and naive-nor-mative approach to voting assume that correct voting uses a (relatively) large chunk of an individual's cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Correct Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronotype has been linked to politically meaningful psychological traits, such as the Big Five (Lipnevich et al, 2017) and the Dark Triad (Jonason et al, 2013), and with demographic characteristics, such as urban-rural residence (Carvalho et al, 2014), age, and sex (Fischer et al, 2017). Inadequate sleep is linked to cognitive burdens (Killgore, 2010;Vaseghi et al, 2021); cognitive load affects ideological cognition (Eidelman et al, 2012), decision-making (Deck & Jahedi, 2015), especially as complexity increases (Allred et al, 2016), candidate evaluation (Nawara & Bailey, 2021), and the processing of news information (Van Cauwenberge et al, 2014). Sleep deficits also disrupt emotion regulation (Palmer & Alfano, 2017), which may make politics more stressful (Ford & Feinberg, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%