2016
DOI: 10.16910/jemr.9.4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ScanGraph: A Novel Scanpath Comparison Method Using Visualisation of Graph Cliques

Abstract: The article describes a new tool for analyses of eye-movement data. Many different approaches to scanpath comparison exist. One of the most frequently used approaches is String Edit Distance, where the gaze trajectories are replaced by the sequences of visited Areas of Interest. In cartographic literature, the most commonly used software for scanpath comparison is eyePatterns. During the analysis of eyePatterns functionality, we have found that tree-graph visualization of its results is not reliable. Thus, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then generated scanpaths for each of the eight teaching events, whereby the built-in saccade and fixation detector of SMI BeGaze 3.4 (see details: SensoMotoric Instruments, 2017) was used. The raw eye-tracking data were converted into strings using the conversion application smi2ogama (Dolezalova and Popelka, 2016), meaning that the fixation sequence was recoded into a sequence of strings representing the fixation locations. Finally, we obtained multiple scanpaths as strings (e.g., TEKBP) for every participant and each of the eight teaching events extracted from the two different classroom context scenes described above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then generated scanpaths for each of the eight teaching events, whereby the built-in saccade and fixation detector of SMI BeGaze 3.4 (see details: SensoMotoric Instruments, 2017) was used. The raw eye-tracking data were converted into strings using the conversion application smi2ogama (Dolezalova and Popelka, 2016), meaning that the fixation sequence was recoded into a sequence of strings representing the fixation locations. Finally, we obtained multiple scanpaths as strings (e.g., TEKBP) for every participant and each of the eight teaching events extracted from the two different classroom context scenes described above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanpath analysis promises rich information regarding to spatial and temporal characteristics of eye movements and contributes to understanding individual differences in a more systematic way (e.g. Anderson, Anderson, Kingstone, & Bischof, 2014;Dolezalova, & Popelka, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be possible to study also other aspects, e.g. applying data from OGAMA into ScanGraph (Dolezalova & Popelka, 2016) that analyses gaze transitions between AOI and compare them with sequence of the mostly gifted respondent. We assume that the features of the ScanGraph will be used in our future studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%