1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.100118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning differential optical profilometer for simultaneous measurement of amplitude and phase variation

Abstract: A scanning optical profilometer is described which can simultaneously and independently measure the differential phase/amplitude variation of light reflected off an object surface. This information may then be interpreted as topographical and reflectivity variation of the object surface. The system is based on a heterodyne interferometer and uses two beams to probe the surface. The theoretical sensitivity of the system is 3×10−3 mrad in phase and 3 in 105 in reflectivity variation, both measured in a 1 kHz ban… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experimental results described in section 4 the response was indeed obtained in this way as described in the next section. The effective transfer function becomes a summation rather than a integral, thus: i=N Ceff(mO) C(m;O4u i+ 6u) (4) i=-M where i is an integer, iu is the step size in normalised units and du is the distance between the focal plane and the sampling plane closest to the focal plane. Figure 5 shows the effects of varying the step size, u, the continuous plot in figure 5a shows the result of sampling with a normalised step size equal to 5 normalised axial units, where it can be seen that Cef(m;O) is similar to the infocus transfer function.…”
Section: The Effect Of Finite Sampling Interval On the Extended Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experimental results described in section 4 the response was indeed obtained in this way as described in the next section. The effective transfer function becomes a summation rather than a integral, thus: i=N Ceff(mO) C(m;O4u i+ 6u) (4) i=-M where i is an integer, iu is the step size in normalised units and du is the distance between the focal plane and the sampling plane closest to the focal plane. Figure 5 shows the effects of varying the step size, u, the continuous plot in figure 5a shows the result of sampling with a normalised step size equal to 5 normalised axial units, where it can be seen that Cef(m;O) is similar to the infocus transfer function.…”
Section: The Effect Of Finite Sampling Interval On the Extended Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its high-sensitivity results from the phase measurement of the beat signal produced by two parallel incident beams whose frequencies are slightly different from each other (Komatsu et al 1990). In addition, DHI based on common path schemes having the same optical path of two beams (See, Appel, and Somekh 1988), has a strong point compared to non-differential interferometers, as it is less sensitive to environmental disturbances, especially high vibration (Somekh et al 1995).…”
Section: Description Of the Proposed System Differential Heterodyne Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase contrast microscopy and DIC microscopy have both traditionally been used to image biological cells or to measure surface profilometry. 130 Laser scanning has been used extensively for surface profiling using dual path interferometry, 131,132 and differential dual-beam systems with either spatial offset, [133][134][135][136] or angular offset for heterodyne detection. 137 Single-beam configurations have detected both amplitude and phase shifts in surface reflectance using a common-path approach.…”
Section: Phase-contrast Biocdmentioning
confidence: 99%