2004
DOI: 10.13031/2013.15881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies of New and Used Fan Nozzles for Agricultural Sprayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As other studies indicate, these changes can be observed by measuring the dimensions of the nozzle orifice during the test (Krishnan et al, 2004;Krause et al, 2003;Sztachó-Pekáry, 2005). However, this parameter (ozzle orifice diameter) appears to be not practical when dealing with the inspection of sprayers, which is required by the Directive 2009/128/EC for the sustainable use of pesticide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As other studies indicate, these changes can be observed by measuring the dimensions of the nozzle orifice during the test (Krishnan et al, 2004;Krause et al, 2003;Sztachó-Pekáry, 2005). However, this parameter (ozzle orifice diameter) appears to be not practical when dealing with the inspection of sprayers, which is required by the Directive 2009/128/EC for the sustainable use of pesticide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The scanning electron microscopic study of Krishnan et al [12] indicates that nozzle wear patterns could be noticed by comparing micrographs of new and worn nozzles. Moreover, they found that brass and plastic nozzles wear faster than nickel-coated brass and stainless steel nozzles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozkan et al (1992) reported that the spraying pressure, duration of test, type, abrasiveness, concentration of material used in the spray mixture, nozzle type, nozzle size, orifice shape and orifice material were the factors affecting the nozzle wear. It was indicated that much of the difference reported in the nozzle wear rates is due to different operating conditions used when testing nozzles (Krishnan et al 2004). However, the shape defects on a nozzle orifice can result in deteriorating the spray patterns, even though a nozzle's flow rate conformed to standards at a constant spray pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special equipment would be required to actually see the changes in the orifice size and shape. The studies conducted by Krause et al (2003) and Krishnan et al (2004) can be presented as an illustration. In these studies, scanning electron microscopy was used in order to observe the new and used fan-pattern nozzle orifices and, indicated that the scanning electron microscopy can provide nozzle manufacturers with the required information about nozzle to improve performance (Krause et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%