1978
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(78)90141-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning-electron microscopy of chromosome aberrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromosome aberrations were evaluated in 100 well spread metaphases per donor (totally 200 metaphases per concentration). Gaps were not evaluated as CA according to Mace et al (1978). The scoring of SCE was carried out according to the IPCS guidelines (Albertini et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome aberrations were evaluated in 100 well spread metaphases per donor (totally 200 metaphases per concentration). Gaps were not evaluated as CA according to Mace et al (1978). The scoring of SCE was carried out according to the IPCS guidelines (Albertini et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaps were not considered as CA according to Mace et al (1978). For each donor, 100 well-spread, intact metaphases were investigated (totaly 400 metaphase spreads for four donors) in order to score the CAs at each concentration and treatment period.…”
Section: Microscopic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatid and chromosome gaps were not evaluated as chromosome aberrations (Mace et al 1978). The significances between the percentages of means of SCE, cells with CA, the percentages of binuclear cell with MN, PI, MI, and NDI in treated cultures, and their controls were evaluated by using the t test.…”
Section: Statistical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%