“…[2] In our case, the limited spatial and temporal resolution during the SEM imaging does not allow the evaluation of a possible area loss of the primary particles, whose dissolution rate has been reported to initially proceed rapidly by the reduction of the surface oxide layer. [4] It has also been reported that the dissolution of metallic Cu is slower than in cupric oxides, [30] and considering that we do not observe a noticeable change in the Cu nanocube morphology, we can conclude that the inevitable OCV-induced Cu NC oxidation is limited to a thin layer (i.e., not observable under the conditions used). In addition, the discernible redeposition of secondary particles, during the in situ SEM experiments at the cathodic potential of −1.1 V versus RHE, suggests that the simultaneous dissolution of the primary particles continues with a moderate amount of dissolved species, which is dependent on the applied, cathodic potential.…”