2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Electrospray Microscopy with Nanopipets

Abstract: Electrospray from nanopipets is used to realize scanning electrospray microscopy (SESM). This technique provides an ambient, noncontact method to investigate surface topography with distance dependence of electrospray current as feedback for imaging. SESM approach curves, line scans, and images are reported. Salt deposition on the sample surface from SESM is also characterized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the well-controlled ES current versus electric field, ES with micrometer gap has been tested as a scanning microscopy to measure the surface topography with resolution in the µm range, linking the ES current evolution with the electric field i.e. with the gap length above surface defaults (Yuill et al, 2015). Moreover, ES has been tested with magnetic fluids, as a tunable current source from simultaneous ES and electrical discharge versus the magnetic field intensity to control the shape of cones, the subsequent discharge regimes and related ozone production for gas depollution purposes (Uehara et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the well-controlled ES current versus electric field, ES with micrometer gap has been tested as a scanning microscopy to measure the surface topography with resolution in the µm range, linking the ES current evolution with the electric field i.e. with the gap length above surface defaults (Yuill et al, 2015). Moreover, ES has been tested with magnetic fluids, as a tunable current source from simultaneous ES and electrical discharge versus the magnetic field intensity to control the shape of cones, the subsequent discharge regimes and related ozone production for gas depollution purposes (Uehara et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,26,29,51 However, for nanopipettes that have openings less than 50 nm in diameter, the resolution of SEM is insufficient. The characterization of nanopipettes using SEM also becomes more difficult at this scale as it requires the nanopipette to be sputtered with a conducting metal, which affects the nanopipette dimensions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Existing Methods For Nanopipette Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Beyond electroanalysis, nanopipettes are finding novel applications as devices for electrospray massspectrometry. 28,29 Nanopipette probes, employed in different types of scanning probe microscopy (SPM) techniques, 5,11,30 are used increasingly for the study of interfacial properties across a range of materials including electrodes and living cells. 3,31,32 Examples of SPM techniques that can employ nanopipettes include scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM), 30,33 scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM), 31,[34][35][36][37][38] SICM-SECM 9,39 and scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, applications of nanopipettes have included their use as sensors for a variety of different analytes, as well as tools for local delivery of molecules, achieved by varying the electric field at the end of the nanopipette to trap or release charged species . Additionally, they serve as powerful probes for electrochemical reactions, surface charge and topographical imaging, as well as other diverse applications, such as enabling the nanobiopsy of living cells and electrospray analysis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%