The enantiomeric complexes Λ-and ∆-[Ru(bpy) 2 (pqx)](PF 6 ) 2 [pqx = 2-(2Ј-pyridyl)quinoxaline] were synthesized and characterized by various spectroscopic techniques. Their binding properties to the oligonucleotide duplex d(CGCGAATTCGCG) 2 were subsequently studied by NMR spectroscopy. 1D and 2D NMR techniques provided evidence for major-groove binding of both enantiomers with the oligonucleotide. The ∆-[Ru(bpy) 2 (pqx)](PF 6 ) 2 enantiomer binds
IndroductionThe binding properties of transition metal tris-chelate complexes with DNA have been extensively studied in recent years. [1,2] One of the pioneering works was the report by Barton et al. pointing out the remarkable difference in the binding strength of the enantiomers of [Zn(phen) 3 ] 2ϩ with DNA.[3] The interactions between CT-DNA and the enantiomeric ruthenium complexes Λ-and ∆-[Ru(phen) 3 ] 2ϩ have been studied by several methods, with controversial conclusions. Several studies led to the conclusion that the ∆-isomer either intercalates between the base pairs, [4Ϫ7] or is partially inserted, [8Ϫ10] or it binds to DNA in various ways [11,12] (e.g. in the major [8,10] or in the minor groove [13,14] ). On the other hand Λ-[Ru(phen) 3 ] 2ϩ binds to DNA either by electrostatic forces, [4,5] or surface-bound interactions, [6,12] and with weak binding in the minor [13,14] or the major groove. [8,10] 2,2Ј-Bipyridine has been used as a ligand less often than 1,10-phenanthroline in tris-chelate complexes of Ru II in studies of interactions with DNA due to the lower affinity of this ligand to bind to the DNA helix. Based on photophysical results, it has been suggested that ation or electrostatic interactions. [4,5,15] It has also been reported that no enantiomeric discrimination is apparent between the binding of Λ-and ∆-[Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2ϩ with DNA.[16]The interaction of the mixed-ligand complex [Ru(bpy) 2 (phen)] 2ϩ with DNA has been studied by linear dichroism spectroscopy with the aim of investigating the role of each ligand involved in the complex. The results indicate that the complex shows a similar binding geometry to [Ru(phen) 3 ] 2ϩ in which one phen ligand faces the DNA base pairs, almost as if it were intercalated nearly parallel to them.[9] A similar mixed-ligand complex, [Ru(bpy) 2 (ppz)] 2ϩ (ppz ϭ 4,7-phenanthrolino [6,5-b]pyrazine, a non-classical intercalative ligand), which is longer than phen by a sixmembered fused ring, shows that both Λ-and ∆-enantiomers bind in the major groove of DNA by partial intercalation of the ppz ligand. The bpy ligands are not capable of inducing intercalation and the enantioselectivity is maintained by the different interactions of the ∆-and Λ-enantiomers with the DNA major groove. [17] In an attempt to contribute to the better understanding of how these mixedligand complexes bind to DNA, we have synthesized, characterized and studied the binding properties of the enantiomeric complexes Λ-and ∆-[Ru(bpy) 2 (pqx)] 2ϩ [pqx ϭ 2-(2Ј-pyridyl)quinoxaline], to the oligonucleotide duplex d(5Ј-CGCGAATTCGCG-3Ј) 2 mainly by NMR...