2006
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27453-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Microdeformation Microscopy: Subsurface Imaging and Measurement of Elastic Constants at Mesoscopic Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift frequency difference between these two specimens, due to their different modulus, is about 350 Hz. Note that the SMM has already been tested on standard hard materials like silicon and silica [6,21,26] and a precision of nearly 5 % have been determined with the used model.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shift frequency difference between these two specimens, due to their different modulus, is about 350 Hz. Note that the SMM has already been tested on standard hard materials like silicon and silica [6,21,26] and a precision of nearly 5 % have been determined with the used model.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SMM has already been tested on standard hard materials such as silicon and silica 6,12,19 and leaded to a precision of nearly 5% with the model we are using. We took 2.8 MPa for the static Young modulus ͑dynamic mechanical measurement value͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used a continuous model 6,12 ͑Fig. 3͒ to obtain Young's moduli values of tested samples from the measured contact resonant frequencies.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al [19] proposed a tunable resonance method to eliminate the uncertainties of the clamping point conditions in resonance experiments. To measure the local elasticity and dynamic viscoelasticity, contact resonance method such as atomic force acoustic microscopy [20,21], scanning microdeformation microscopy [22], and piezoelectric cantilever [23] have been developed, which use a high-quality-factor cantilever beam to probe the sample's modulus and damping properties [24][25][26][27][28]. Other category of dynamic testing techniques include the impact test, the shear force test, and the small-scale split-Hopkinson tension/pressure bar technique.…”
Section: Dynamic Characterization Of Small Fibers Based On the Flexur...mentioning
confidence: 99%